Mechanical testing · Instrumented scratch

Scratch Testing for Cohesive Failure

Cohesive failure is damage within a coating, such as cracking, chipping, buckling or plastic gouging, while the coating stays attached to its substrate. Progressive-load scratch tests reveal the loads at which these failures begin, usually before any delamination. For paints, polymers and glasses, the same tests measure mar and scratch resistance as users see it.

Scratch track showing cohesive cracking within a coating

At a glance

Results
Critical loads for the first cohesive failures (cracking, chipping), elastic and plastic deformation, and residual scratch depth.
Depth analysis
Pre-scan, scratch and post-scan give true penetration depth and residual depth, separating elastic recovery from permanent damage.
Signals
Friction and acoustic emission recorded along the scratch, correlated with images of each failure.
Load range
Nano scratch from fractions of a mN to micro scratch at tens of N.
Styli
Fine conical diamond tips (e.g. 2 µm radius) for nano scratch and mar; Rockwell C for micro scratch.
Imaging
Tracking zoomed view of the full scratch for post-test inspection.

What cohesive-failure testing tells you

Many coatings never delaminate in service; they crack, chip or get marked first. Paints and clear coats mar, hard coatings develop tensile cracks, glass and screen protectors fracture, polymer layers gouge. Measuring the loads at which these cohesive failures begin tells you how a coating will look and perform long before adhesion becomes the issue.

How the test works

  1. A low-load pre-scan records the original surface profile.
  2. The stylus scratches the surface under a progressively increasing load, recording penetration depth, friction and acoustic emission.
  3. A low-load post-scan records the residual depth.
  4. The full scratch is imaged; each failure is located and converted to a critical load, and depth data separate elastic from plastic deformation.

Failure modes to look for

  • Tensile and conformal cracks behind or within the track, typical of hard coatings on softer substrates;
  • Chipping along the track edges in brittle layers;
  • Plastic deformation and pile-up in ductile polymers and paints;
  • Marring: shallow, appearance-level damage in clear coats.

Each mode has its own critical load. The failure sequence and its loads characterise the coating far better than a single number.

Nano scratch for paints and thin films

Fine-tipped nano scratch separates the mechanisms of mar damage in paints. In NANOVEA’s paint-on-metal study, a 2 µm, 90° conical tip ramped from 0.015 to 20 mN across a 30–50 µm paint that had aged seven years. Pre- and post-scans at 0.2 mN gave the true scratch depth, and the weathered paint failed at lower loads than fresh paint would. Temperature matters too, as NANOVEA’s ASTM D7187 temperature study explores.

Micro scratch for hard and brittle surfaces

Hard coatings and glass need higher loads. In NANOVEA’s screen protector study, a 50 µm Rockwell tip ramped from 0.1 to 12 N. Tempered glass showed its first failure at 3.6 N and a second at 7.4 N, while TPU failed at 2.0 N in a ductile mode: different materials, different failure mechanisms, both quantified on the same instrument.

Standards

StandardScope
ASTM D7187Mechanistic aspects of scratch/mar behaviour of paint coatings by nanoscratching

Nano scratch of paint coatings to separate elastic, plastic and fracture behaviour.

ASTM D5178Mar resistance of organic coatings

Mar damage of organic coatings under a loaded stylus.

ASTM C1624Adhesion strength and mechanical failure modes of ceramic coatings by quantitative single point scratch testing

Critical loads for cohesive and adhesive failure of hard coatings.

ISO 20502Fine ceramics: determination of adhesion of ceramic coatings by scratch testing

Progressive-load scratch of ceramic coatings, including cohesive failure modes.

ASTM D7027Scratch resistance of polymeric coatings and plastics using an instrumented scratch machine

Onset of damage in polymer coatings and plastics under progressive load.

ISO 1518Paints and varnishes: determination of scratch resistance

Scratch resistance of paint films.

Instrument parameter limits may differ from those specified within each standard.

Related tests

Instruments that run this test

Every instrument is built to order. Send us your samples and we run your test in our laboratory first, then configure the instrument around the result.

Published results

Measured in our own laboratory, on the instruments we design and build, and published with full test parameters.

All mechanical testing application notes →

Independent published research

NANOVEA instruments appear in 438 published studies on indentation, hardness and scratch, by researchers at universities and industrial laboratories worldwide.

All 438 studies →

NANOVEA materials testing laboratory

Need scratch or mar data? Send us your samples.

Our laboratory runs nano and micro scratch tests for cohesive failure and mar resistance on the same mechanical testers we build, and reports critical loads with images of each failure.

Your samples are tested by the people who design the instruments, so you get advice on the method as well as the numbers.

Indentation & scratch lab services

Frequently asked questions

What is cohesive failure in a coating?

Failure within the coating material itself: cracks, chips, buckling or plastic deformation, while the coating remains bonded to the substrate. It contrasts with adhesive failure, where the coating separates at the interface. In a progressive scratch, cohesive failures usually appear at lower loads than adhesive failure.

What is mar resistance?

The resistance of a surface, usually a paint or clear coat, to fine, shallow damage that spoils its appearance without penetrating it, such as from washing, wiping or light abrasion. Nano scratch tests with fine tips (ASTM D7187) separate the elastic, plastic and fracture contributions to marring.

Why measure true and residual depth?

A low-load pre-scan records the original surface; the scratch records penetration under load; a post-scan records what remains. The difference between penetration and residual depth is elastic recovery. A coating that recovers elastically can hide damage under load, and residual depth shows the permanent damage that a user would see.

How does weathering affect scratch results?

Aging, UV exposure and moisture can embrittle paints and polymers, lowering the loads at which they crack. NANOVEA's test on a 7-year-old paint found lower failure loads than expected for unweathered paint, which is why weathered samples are tested when service performance matters.

Can glass and brittle coatings be tested?

Yes. Progressive scratches show the load at which brittle surfaces start to crack, and acoustic emission is particularly useful for detecting cracking. NANOVEA's screen-protector study found tempered glass failing first at 3.6 N, while a TPU film failed at 2.0 N by a different, ductile mode.