Mechanical testing · Instrumented indentation

Yield Strength, Tensile Strength & Fatigue by Indentation

Flat-punch indentation presses a cylindrical diamond punch into a polished surface and analyses the load–depth curve to obtain yield strength and ultimate tensile strength. Published NANOVEA results are comparable with conventional tensile values. Repeated loading at one location gives indentation fatigue. No dog-bone coupon is needed, and many tests fit on one small sample.

Yield strength and fatigue measured by flat-punch indentation

At a glance

Results
Yield strength and ultimate tensile strength from flat-punch indentation; fatigue behaviour from cyclic loading.
Indenter
Cylindrical flat diamond punch, e.g. 200 µm diameter in the published steel and aluminium study.
Sample
Polished flat surface; no machined tensile coupon. Many indents per sample.
Control
True closed-loop feedback from independent load and depth sensors, with direct vertical loading.
Mode
Microindentation module, with loads up to 200 N demonstrated on the CB500 micro module.
Local testing
Small indent size allows testing near welds, heat-affected zones and gradients.

What indentation strength testing tells you

Yield and tensile strength are usually measured on machined tensile coupons. That is slow, needs plenty of material, and cannot test a coating, a weld’s heat-affected zone, a small part or a finished component. Flat-punch indentation measures strength on a small polished area, so it reaches places a tensile test cannot and allows many repeats on a single sample.

How flat-punch indentation works

A cylindrical flat diamond punch is pressed into the surface under controlled load while depth is recorded. Because the punch face has a constant contact area, the load–depth curve is roughly linear while the material deforms elastically. It changes slope distinctly as the material beneath the punch yields. Analysing the curve gives yield strength and, from the subsequent response, ultimate tensile strength.

In NANOVEA’s published study, SS304 and Al6061 were tested in microindentation mode with a 200 µm flat diamond punch on mirror-polished samples, giving yield and tensile strength comparable with conventional tensile test values.

Why it avoids some tensile-test pitfalls

Tensile results depend on coupon preparation and on the alignment and configuration of the tensile machine, and different machines can give noticeably different results. Machining can also introduce defects that dominate the outcome. Indentation sidesteps coupon preparation entirely, and the small indent size allows several tests on one sample, so local variation becomes data rather than noise.

Fatigue by repeated indentation

Loading and unloading the same location repeatedly shows how a material responds to cyclic stress: whether depth keeps increasing, how stiffness evolves and when damage accumulates. Indentation fatigue gives comparative fatigue behaviour on small volumes such as coatings and treated surfaces, complementing conventional fatigue tests.

The same platform measures the elastic limit by spherical indentation, and stiffness and fracture load in micro three-point bending. Together these build a picture of mechanical strength from samples far smaller than a tensile bar.

Test environments

Instruments that run this test

Every instrument is built to order. Send us your samples and we run your test in our laboratory first, then configure the instrument around the result.

Published results

Measured in our own laboratory, on the instruments we design and build, and published with full test parameters.

All mechanical testing application notes →

Independent published research

NANOVEA instruments appear in 438 published studies on indentation, hardness and scratch, by researchers at universities and industrial laboratories worldwide.

All 438 studies →

NANOVEA materials testing laboratory

No room for tensile coupons? Send us your samples.

Our laboratory measures yield strength, tensile strength and fatigue by indentation on the same mechanical testers we build, and reports results with the full test parameters.

Your samples are tested by the people who design the instruments, so you get advice on the method as well as the numbers.

Indentation & scratch lab services

Frequently asked questions

Can yield strength really be measured by indentation?

Yes, with a flat cylindrical punch. Unlike a sharp tip, a flat punch has a constant contact area, so the load–depth curve shows a distinct change when the material under the punch begins to yield. NANOVEA's analysis of that curve gives yield strength and ultimate tensile strength, and published results on SS304 and Al6061 are comparable with conventional tensile values.

What are the advantages over a tensile test?

No machined coupon: a small polished area is enough, which saves preparation time and cost and avoids defects introduced by machining. Many tests fit on one sample, so scatter and local variation can be measured. Testing can be done on finished parts, coatings, welds and heat-affected zones that cannot be made into tensile specimens.

How does indentation fatigue work?

The same location is loaded and unloaded repeatedly, and the evolution of depth and stiffness over the cycles shows how the material accumulates damage or work-hardens. It gives comparative fatigue behaviour on small volumes, complementing conventional fatigue testing.

Why must the sample be polished?

Surface roughness and defects affect the initial contact between the flat punch and the surface and add scatter. In the published study, samples were mechanically polished to a mirror-like finish before testing to avoid that influence.

Does indentation replace standard tensile testing?

Indentation gives values comparable with tensile tests and is ideal for local, small-volume and comparative work, quality control and samples that cannot be machined. Where a specification requires a standard tensile test, such as ASTM E8, that test remains the reference.