Application Note | Polymer Tribology

Tribology of Polymers: Friction and Wear of Common Plastics

Comparing the Friction and Wear Resistance of Six Common Polymers with a Pin-on-Disk Tribometer

Tire tread, a polymer tribology application

Research & Experimental Testing

Duanjie Li & Pierre Leroux

Visual Design & Editorial

Andrew Shore

Introduction

Polymers have been used extensively in a wide variety of applications and have become an indispensable part of everyday life. Natural polymers such as amber, silk, and natural rubber have played an essential role in human history. The fabrication process of synthetic polymers can be optimized to achieve unique physical properties such as toughness, viscoelasticity, self-lubrication, and many others.

Why Wear and Friction of Polymers Matter

Polymers are commonly used for tribological applications, such as tires, bearings, and conveyor belts. Different wear mechanisms occur depending on the mechanical properties of the polymer, the contact conditions, and the properties of the debris or transfer film formed during the wear process. To ensure that the polymers possess sufficient wear resistance under the service conditions, reliable and quantifiable tribological evaluation is necessary. Tribological evaluation allows us to quantitatively compare the wear behaviors of different polymers in a controlled and monitored manner to select the material candidate for the target application.

The NANOVEA Tribometer offers repeatable wear and friction testing using ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, with optional high-temperature wear and lubrication modules available in one pre-integrated system. This unmatched range allows users to simulate the different work environments of the polymers including concentrated stress, wear, and high temperature, etc.

Measurement Objective

In this study, we showcased that the NANOVEA Tribometer is an ideal tool for comparing the friction and wear resistance of different polymers in a well-controlled and quantitative manner.

NANOVEA T2000 High Load

Pneumatic Tribometer

NANOVEA T2000 high load pneumatic tribometer

Test Procedure

Al2O3 ball holder above a polymer sample on the rotating stage of the NANOVEA tribometer
Fig. 1: Setup of the polymer wear test.

The coefficient of friction (COF) and the wear resistance of different common polymers were evaluated by the NANOVEA Tribometer. An Al2O3 ball was used as the counter material (pin, static sample). The wear tracks on the polymers (dynamic rotating samples) were measured using a non-contact 3D profilometer and optical microscope after the tests concluded. It should be noted that a non-contact endoscopic sensor can be used to measure the depth the pin penetrates the dynamic sample during a wear test as an option. The test parameters are summarized in Table 1. The wear rate, K, was evaluated using the formula K = V/(F × s), where V is the worn volume, F is the normal load, and s is the sliding distance.

Please note that Al2O3 balls were used as the counter material in this study. Any solid material can be substituted to more closely simulate the performance of two specimens under actual application conditions.

ParameterValue
Ball materialAl2O3
Ball diameter6 mm
Normal force20 N
Rotational speed200 rpm
Duration of test10 min
Wear track radius5 mm
LubricantNone
AtmosphereAir
Temperature24°C (room)
Square white Nylon 66 sample
Sample of Nylon 66.

Table 1: Test parameters of the wear measurements.

Results and Discussion

Wear rate is a vital factor for determining the service lifetime of the materials, while the friction plays a critical role during the tribological applications. Fig. 2 compares the evolution of the COF for different polymers against the Al2O3 ball during the wear tests. COF works as an indicator of when failures occur and the wear process enters a new stage. Among the tested polymers, HDPE maintains the lowest constant COF of ~0.15 throughout the wear test. The smooth COF implies that a stable tribo-contact is formed.

Coefficient of friction versus revolutions for CPVC, HDPE, LDPE, Nylon, polypropylene and PVC over 2000 revolutions
Fig. 2: Evolution of COF during the wear tests.

Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 compare the wear tracks of the polymer samples after the test is measured by the optical microscope. The in-situ non-contact 3D profilometer precisely determines the wear volume of the polymer samples, making it possible to accurately calculate wear rates of 0.0029, 0.0020, and 0.0032 mm³/N·m for HDPE, Nylon 66 and Polypropylene, respectively. In comparison, the CPVC sample shows the highest wear rate of 0.1121 mm³/N·m. Deep parallel wear scars are present in the wear track of CPVC.

Micrographs of the wear tracks on CPVC, HDPE, LDPE, Nylon 66, polypropylene and PVC
Fig. 3: Wear scars on the polymer samples after the tests.
Cross-section profiles of the wear tracks, deepest for CPVC at about 0.16 mm
Fig. 4: Profiles of the wear track cross section.
3D view of the circular wear track on the CPVC sample
Fig. 5: 3D morphology of the wear track on the CPVC sample.
PolymerMaximum depth (µm)Wear rate (mm³/N·m)
CPVC1670.1121
HDPE12.10.0029
LDPE62.20.0296
Nylon 668.870.0020
Polypropylene14.20.0032
PVC59.20.0214

Table 2: Wear track depth and wear rate analysis of the polymers.

Conclusion

The wear resistance of the polymers plays a vital role in their service performance. In this study, we showcased that the NANOVEA Tribometer evaluates the coefficient of friction and wear rate of different polymers in a well-controlled and quantitative manner. HDPE shows the lowest COF of ~0.15 among the tested polymers. HDPE, Nylon 66, and Polypropylene samples possess low wear rates of 0.0029, 0.0020 and 0.0032 mm³/N·m, respectively. The combination of low friction and great wear resistance makes HDPE a good candidate for polymer tribological applications.

The in-situ non-contact 3D profilometer enables precise wear volume measurement and offers a tool to analyze the detailed morphology of the wear tracks, providing more insight into the fundamental understanding of wear mechanisms.

Frequently Asked Questions About Polymer Friction and Wear Testing

Why test the friction and wear of polymers?

Polymers are used in tribological applications such as tires, bearings and conveyor belts, and their wear mechanism depends on their mechanical properties, the contact conditions and the debris or transfer film formed. Quantified tribological evaluation compares polymers under controlled conditions to select the right material for the application.

How were the polymers tested?

A 6 mm Al₂O₃ ball slid on each polymer at 20 N and 200 rpm on a 5 mm radius for 10 minutes in air at 24°C, and the wear tracks were measured with a non-contact 3D profilometer and an optical microscope.

Which polymer had the lowest friction?

HDPE kept the lowest, constant coefficient of friction of ~0.15 throughout the test, indicating a stable tribo-contact.

Which polymers wore the least?

Nylon 66, HDPE and polypropylene had the lowest wear rates (0.0020, 0.0029 and 0.0032 mm³/N·m) and the shallowest tracks (8.87, 12.1 and 14.2 µm). CPVC wore most, with a 167 µm deep track, a wear rate of 0.1121 mm³/N·m and deep parallel wear scars.

Which polymer is best for tribological applications?

In this study HDPE combined the lowest friction with high wear resistance, making it a good candidate for polymer tribological applications.

Which NANOVEA instrument was used for polymer tribology?

The NANOVEA T2000 tribometer with ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, optional high-temperature and lubrication modules, and an in-situ non-contact 3D profilometer for wear volume.

Need Reliable Polymer Wear Testing?