Application Note | Polymer Tribology
Tribology of Polymers: Friction and Wear of Common Plastics
Comparing the Friction and Wear Resistance of Six Common Polymers with a Pin-on-Disk Tribometer

Research & Experimental Testing
Duanjie Li & Pierre Leroux
Visual Design & Editorial
Andrew Shore
Introduction
Polymers have been used extensively in a wide variety of applications and have become an indispensable part of everyday life. Natural polymers such as amber, silk, and natural rubber have played an essential role in human history. The fabrication process of synthetic polymers can be optimized to achieve unique physical properties such as toughness, viscoelasticity, self-lubrication, and many others.
Why Wear and Friction of Polymers Matter
Polymers are commonly used for tribological applications, such as tires, bearings, and conveyor belts. Different wear mechanisms occur depending on the mechanical properties of the polymer, the contact conditions, and the properties of the debris or transfer film formed during the wear process. To ensure that the polymers possess sufficient wear resistance under the service conditions, reliable and quantifiable tribological evaluation is necessary. Tribological evaluation allows us to quantitatively compare the wear behaviors of different polymers in a controlled and monitored manner to select the material candidate for the target application.
The NANOVEA Tribometer offers repeatable wear and friction testing using ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, with optional high-temperature wear and lubrication modules available in one pre-integrated system. This unmatched range allows users to simulate the different work environments of the polymers including concentrated stress, wear, and high temperature, etc.
ℹ️ Learn more about friction and wear testing lab services for polymers.
Measurement Objective
In this study, we showcased that the NANOVEA Tribometer is an ideal tool for comparing the friction and wear resistance of different polymers in a well-controlled and quantitative manner.
Test Procedure

The coefficient of friction (COF) and the wear resistance of different common polymers were evaluated by the NANOVEA Tribometer. An Al2O3 ball was used as the counter material (pin, static sample). The wear tracks on the polymers (dynamic rotating samples) were measured using a non-contact 3D profilometer and optical microscope after the tests concluded. It should be noted that a non-contact endoscopic sensor can be used to measure the depth the pin penetrates the dynamic sample during a wear test as an option. The test parameters are summarized in Table 1. The wear rate, K, was evaluated using the formula K = V/(F × s), where V is the worn volume, F is the normal load, and s is the sliding distance.
Please note that Al2O3 balls were used as the counter material in this study. Any solid material can be substituted to more closely simulate the performance of two specimens under actual application conditions.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Ball material | Al2O3 |
| Ball diameter | 6 mm |
| Normal force | 20 N |
| Rotational speed | 200 rpm |
| Duration of test | 10 min |
| Wear track radius | 5 mm |
| Lubricant | None |
| Atmosphere | Air |
| Temperature | 24°C (room) |

Table 1: Test parameters of the wear measurements.
Results and Discussion
Wear rate is a vital factor for determining the service lifetime of the materials, while the friction plays a critical role during the tribological applications. Fig. 2 compares the evolution of the COF for different polymers against the Al2O3 ball during the wear tests. COF works as an indicator of when failures occur and the wear process enters a new stage. Among the tested polymers, HDPE maintains the lowest constant COF of ~0.15 throughout the wear test. The smooth COF implies that a stable tribo-contact is formed.

Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 compare the wear tracks of the polymer samples after the test is measured by the optical microscope. The in-situ non-contact 3D profilometer precisely determines the wear volume of the polymer samples, making it possible to accurately calculate wear rates of 0.0029, 0.0020, and 0.0032 mm³/N·m for HDPE, Nylon 66 and Polypropylene, respectively. In comparison, the CPVC sample shows the highest wear rate of 0.1121 mm³/N·m. Deep parallel wear scars are present in the wear track of CPVC.



| Polymer | Maximum depth (µm) | Wear rate (mm³/N·m) |
|---|---|---|
| CPVC | 167 | 0.1121 |
| HDPE | 12.1 | 0.0029 |
| LDPE | 62.2 | 0.0296 |
| Nylon 66 | 8.87 | 0.0020 |
| Polypropylene | 14.2 | 0.0032 |
| PVC | 59.2 | 0.0214 |
Table 2: Wear track depth and wear rate analysis of the polymers.
Conclusion
The wear resistance of the polymers plays a vital role in their service performance. In this study, we showcased that the NANOVEA Tribometer evaluates the coefficient of friction and wear rate of different polymers in a well-controlled and quantitative manner. HDPE shows the lowest COF of ~0.15 among the tested polymers. HDPE, Nylon 66, and Polypropylene samples possess low wear rates of 0.0029, 0.0020 and 0.0032 mm³/N·m, respectively. The combination of low friction and great wear resistance makes HDPE a good candidate for polymer tribological applications.
The in-situ non-contact 3D profilometer enables precise wear volume measurement and offers a tool to analyze the detailed morphology of the wear tracks, providing more insight into the fundamental understanding of wear mechanisms.
Frequently Asked Questions About Polymer Friction and Wear Testing
Why test the friction and wear of polymers?
Polymers are used in tribological applications such as tires, bearings and conveyor belts, and their wear mechanism depends on their mechanical properties, the contact conditions and the debris or transfer film formed. Quantified tribological evaluation compares polymers under controlled conditions to select the right material for the application.
How were the polymers tested?
A 6 mm Al₂O₃ ball slid on each polymer at 20 N and 200 rpm on a 5 mm radius for 10 minutes in air at 24°C, and the wear tracks were measured with a non-contact 3D profilometer and an optical microscope.
Which polymer had the lowest friction?
HDPE kept the lowest, constant coefficient of friction of ~0.15 throughout the test, indicating a stable tribo-contact.
Which polymers wore the least?
Nylon 66, HDPE and polypropylene had the lowest wear rates (0.0020, 0.0029 and 0.0032 mm³/N·m) and the shallowest tracks (8.87, 12.1 and 14.2 µm). CPVC wore most, with a 167 µm deep track, a wear rate of 0.1121 mm³/N·m and deep parallel wear scars.
Which polymer is best for tribological applications?
In this study HDPE combined the lowest friction with high wear resistance, making it a good candidate for polymer tribological applications.
Which NANOVEA instrument was used for polymer tribology?
The NANOVEA T2000 tribometer with ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, optional high-temperature and lubrication modules, and an in-situ non-contact 3D profilometer for wear volume.



