Application Note | Flooring Wear Testing

Wood Flooring Wear Test with the NANOVEA Tribometer

Comparing the Friction and Wear Resistance of Three Wood Flooring Finishes

Wooden table surface with a coffee cup

Research & Experimental Testing

NANOVEA Laboratory

Visual Design & Editorial

Andrew Shore

Introduction

Wood has been used for thousands of years as a building material for homes, furniture, and flooring. It has a combination of natural beauty and durability, making it an ideal candidate for flooring. Unlike carpet, hardwood floors keep their color for a long time and can be easily cleaned and maintained; however, being a natural material, most wood flooring requires the application of a surface finish to protect the wood from various kinds of damage such as scuffing and chipping over time. In this study, a NANOVEA Tribometer was used to measure the wear rate and coefficient of friction (COF) to better understand the comparative performance of three wood finishes.

Why Comparing Wood Finish Wear and COF Matters

The service behavior of a wood species used for flooring is often related to its wear resistance. The change in the individual cellular and fiber structure of different species of wood contributes to their different mechanical and tribological behaviors. Actual service tests of wood as flooring materials are expensive, difficult to duplicate, and require long periods of testing time. As a result, it becomes valuable to develop a simple wear test that can produce results that are reliable, reproducible and straightforward.

Measurement Objective

In this study, we simulated and compared the wear behaviors of three types of wood to showcase the capability of the NANOVEA Tribometer in evaluating the tribological properties of wood in a controlled and monitored manner.

NANOVEA T50 Compact

Free Weight Tribometer

NANOVEA T50 free weight tribometer for friction and wear testing

Test Procedure

Ball holder of the tribometer pressing on a wood flooring sample on the rotating stage
Wood flooring sample on the NANOVEA tribometer.
ParameterValue
InstrumentT50
Wood samplesAntique Birch Hardwood, Courtship Grey Oak and Santos Mahogany
Normal force20 N
Wear ring radius6 mm
Speed300 rpm
Duration of test10 min

Table 1: Test parameters for COF and wear measurements.

Birch, grey oak and mahogany flooring samples with circular wear tracks
Samples of Antique Birch, Courtship Grey Oak and Santos Mahogany (left to right).

Results and Discussion

Sample description: Antique Birch Hardwood has a 7-layer aluminum oxide finish, providing everyday wear and tear protection. Courtship Grey Oak and Santos Mahogany are both laminate flooring types that vary in surface finish and gloss. The Courtship Grey Oak is a slate gray color, EIR finish, and low gloss. On the other hand, Santos Mahogany is a dark burgundy color, prefinished, and high gloss which allows surface scratches and defects to be more easily hidden.

The evolution of COF during the wear tests of the three wood flooring samples is plotted in Fig. 1. The Antique Birch Hardwood, Courtship Grey Oak and Santos Mahogany samples all showed different COF behavior.

Coefficient of friction versus revolutions over 3000 revolutions for birch, grey oak and mahogany flooring
Fig. 1: Evolution of COF during the wear tests.

It can be observed in the graph above that Antique Birch Hardwood was the only sample that demonstrated a steady COF for the duration of an entire test. The Courtship Grey Oak’s sharp increase in COF and then gradual decrease could be indicative that the sample’s surface roughness largely contributed to its COF behavior. As the sample wore, the surface roughness decreased and became more homogenous which explains the decrease in COF as the sample surface became smoother from mechanical wear. The COF on Santos Mahogany displays a smooth gradual increase in COF at the beginning of the test and then transitioned abruptly into a choppy COF trend. This could indicate that once the laminate coating started to wear through, the steel ball (counter material) made contact with the wood substrate which wore in a quicker and turbulent manner creating the noisier COF behavior towards the end of the test.

Antique Birch Hardwood

Birch sample and the 3D view of its wear track
Fig. 2: 3D view of the scan of sample Antique Birch Hardwood.
Volume-of-a-hole analysis of the birch wear track
Fig. 3: Volume of a hole, Antique Birch Hardwood.

Courtship Grey Oak

Grey oak sample and the 3D view of its wear track
Fig. 4: 3D view of the scan of sample Courtship Grey Oak.
Volume-of-a-hole analysis of the grey oak wear track
Fig. 5: Volume of a hole, Courtship Grey Oak.

Santos Mahogany

Mahogany sample and the 3D view of its wide wear track
Fig. 6: 3D view of the scan of sample Santos Mahogany.
Volume-of-a-hole analysis of the mahogany wear track
Fig. 7: Volume of a hole, Santos Mahogany.
Hole parameterAntique Birch HardwoodCourtship Grey OakSantos Mahogany
Projected area (mm²)44.6830.32125.7
Volume (µm³)4198528484223050791.950068149 × 1010
Max. depth (µm)25.8384.65424.2
Mean depth (µm)9.39713.93155.1

Table 2: Volume-of-a-hole values from Figs. 3, 5 and 7.

Table 3 summarizes the results of the wear track scans and analysis on all wood flooring samples after the wear tests were performed. Detailed information and images for each sample can be seen in Figs. 2 to 7. Based on the wear rate comparison between all three samples, we can deduce that Santos Mahogany proved to be less resilient to mechanical wear than the other two samples. Antique Birch Hardwood and Courtship Grey Oak had very similar wear rates although their wear behavior during their tests differed significantly. Antique Birch Hardwood had a gradual and more uniform wear trend while Courtship Grey Oak showed a shallow and pitted wear track due to the pre-existing surface texture and finish.

SampleVolume lost (µm³)Wear rate (×10−5 mm³/N·m)
Antique Birch Hardwood41985284818.58
Courtship Grey Oak42230507918.69
Santos Mahogany1.95 × 1010862.86

Table 3: Result summary of the wear track analysis.

Conclusion

In this study, we showcased the capacity of NANOVEA’s Tribometer in evaluating the coefficient of friction and wear resistance of three types of wood, Antique Birch Hardwood, Courtship Grey Oak, and Santos Mahogany, in a controlled and monitored manner. The superior mechanical properties of the Antique Birch Hardwood lead to its better wear resistance. The texture and homogeneity of the wood surface play an important role in the wear behavior. The Courtship Grey Oak surface texture such as gaps or cracks between the wood cell fibers may become the weak spots where the wear initiates and propagates.

Laptop and a cup of coffee on a wooden desk

Frequently Asked Questions About Wood Flooring Wear Testing

Why test the wear of wood flooring finishes?

Most wood flooring needs a surface finish to protect it from scuffing and chipping. Real service tests are expensive, slow and hard to duplicate, so a simple, reliable and reproducible laboratory wear test is valuable for comparing finishes.

How was the wood flooring wear test run?

A steel ball ran on each sample on a NANOVEA T50 tribometer at 20 N and 300 rpm on a 6 mm radius for 10 minutes, with friction recorded throughout and the wear track volume measured afterwards in 3D.

Which flooring wore least?

Antique Birch Hardwood, with a 7-layer aluminum oxide finish, and Courtship Grey Oak laminate had similar wear rates of 18.58 and 18.69 ×10⁻⁵ mm³/N·m. Santos Mahogany laminate wore far faster at 862.86 ×10⁻⁵ mm³/N·m.

What does the friction curve reveal?

Birch kept a steady COF throughout. Grey oak rose sharply then eased as its textured surface smoothed. Mahogany rose gradually, then turned choppy, suggesting the laminate coating wore through and the ball reached the wood substrate.

How does surface texture affect wear?

Texture and homogeneity matter: the grey oak’s gaps and cracks between wood cell fibers can become weak spots where wear starts, giving a shallow, pitted wear track.

Which NANOVEA instrument was used?

The NANOVEA T50 tribometer, with the wear tracks analyzed in 3D for volume and depth.

Need Reliable Flooring Wear Testing?