Application Note | Hard Metal Wear
Wear Evaluation of Hard Metal Using Tribometer
Ranking Surface-Hardened Saw Blades by Friction Breakthrough and Wear Volume

Research & Experimental Testing
Duanjie Li
Visual Design & Editorial
Andrew Shore
Introduction
Wear is related to the removal and deformation of material on a surface as a result of mechanical action of the opposite surface. Different types of wear, e.g. abrasion, friction and erosion, take place in virtually every industrial sector and create huge direct and consequential annual losses to the U.S. economy. A study carried out by ASM International (American Society for Metals) showed that wear imposes costs of ~0.75% of the GDP1. As a result, tribology research is critical in improving production efficiency and application performance, as well as the conservation of material, energy and the environment.
Importance of Wear Evaluation for Hard Metal
In order to extend the lifetime of mechanical components and to cut the cost and time of part repair and replacement, surface engineering is carried out to harden the metal surface for wear protection while maintaining the toughness of the core metal. In particular, in this study, surface treatment on the test saw blades has formed a hard surface layer to enhance the wear resistance. Additionally, a low surface friction is favorable to reduce the interaction of the blade and the object to be cut, so as to reduce tool wear and improve cutting efficiency. Therefore, reliable evaluation of the wear performance of surface treated metals is desirable for R&D and quality control in the metal industry.
ℹ️ Learn more about friction and wear testing lab services.
Measurement Objective
In this study, we simulated and compared the reciprocating wear behaviors of saw blades to showcase the capacity of the NANOVEA Tribometer in measuring the coefficient of friction and wear rate of surface hardened metals in a controlled and monitored manner.

Test Procedure
The coefficient of friction, COF, and the wear resistance of three saw blades were evaluated by the NANOVEA Tribometer using the Linear Reciprocating Wear Module. An Al2O3 ball (6 mm diameter) was used as the counter material. The wear track was examined using the NANOVEA 3D non-contact profilometer after the tests. The test parameters are summarized in Table 1.
Please note that the Al2O3 ball as a counter material was used as an example in this study; any solid material with different shapes can be applied using a custom fixture to simulate the actual application situation.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Samples | Three saw blades |
| Normal force | 20 N |
| Amplitude | 15 mm |
| Speed | 200 cycles/min |
| Duration of test | 15 min |
| Counter material | Al₂O₃ ball, 6 mm diameter |
Table 1: Test parameters of the wear measurements.
Results and Discussion
The COF and wear rate of three surface hardened saw blades were measured using the Linear Reciprocating Wear Module. Fig. 2 shows that the three saw blades exhibit significantly different wear behaviors, as indicated by the evolution of COF during the tests. Sample A shows a low COF of ~0.1 at the beginning of the wear test, which slowly increases to a value of ~0.25 until 1600 revolutions. The COF drastically climbs to ~0.7 in the following 100 revolutions, and stays above this value for the rest of the test. Such a drastic change of COF is attributed to the penetration of the Al2O3 ball through the hardened surface and the exposure of the fresh metal underneath. In comparison, Sample B and Sample C exhibit such a significant change to high COF values after 900 and 80 revolutions, respectively, indicating their relatively poorer wear performance compared to Sample A.

Fig. 3 compares the 3D wear track images after the tests measured by the NANOVEA non-contact profilometer. The 3D wear track profile allows direct and accurate determination of the wear track volume calculated by the NANOVEA analysis software, and Table 2 summarizes the results of the wear track analysis. Fig. 4 shows the wear tracks of the three saw blades under the optical microscope. The wear track evaluation is in agreement with the observation of COF evolution: Sample A, which maintains the low COF for the longest period, exhibits the lowest wear volume of 0.13 mm³, compared to 0.23 and 0.32 mm³ for Samples B and C, respectively. The data shown here represents only a small portion of the calculations available in the analysis software.

| Sample | Valley area (mm²) | Valley depth (µm) | Perimeter (mm) | Volume (mm³) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample A | 11.7 | 34.8 | 31.5 | 0.13 |
| Sample B | 15.8 | 46.5 | 32.3 | 0.23 |
| Sample C | 16.4 | 47.9 | 32.2 | 0.32 |
Table 2: Result summary of wear track analysis.

Conclusion
The wear resistance of cutting tools, e.g. the saw blades in this study, is critical in their service performance. A hardened surface layer can significantly extend the lifetime of the cutting tools and reduce the time and cost of tool repair or replacement. In this study, we showcased the capacity of the NANOVEA Tribometer in evaluating the coefficient of friction and wear rate of surface hardened metals in a controlled and monitored manner.
This measurement allows users to quantitatively assess the tribological behaviors of the materials and select the best candidate for the targeted applications. COF serves as an important indicator of the failure of the protective surface layer or coating. The NANOVEA 3D non-contact profilometer enables precise wear volume measurement and offers a tool to analyze the detailed morphology of the wear tracks, providing more insight into the fundamental understanding of wear mechanisms.
NANOVEA Tribometers offer precise and repeatable wear and friction testing using ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, with optional high temperature wear, lubrication and tribo-corrosion modules available in one pre-integrated system.
References
1. Davis, J. R., Surface Engineering for Corrosion and Wear Resistance, ASM International, 2001.
Frequently Asked Questions About Hard Metal Wear Testing
Why evaluate the wear of surface-hardened metals?
Surface engineering hardens the metal surface for wear protection while keeping a tough core, which extends component life and cuts repair and replacement costs; reliable wear evaluation supports R&D and quality control of such treatments.
How were the saw blades tested?
Linear reciprocating wear with a 6 mm Al₂O₃ ball under 20 N, with a 15 mm amplitude at 200 cycles/min for 15 minutes; wear tracks were measured with a 3D non-contact profilometer and examined by optical microscope.
What does a sudden rise in COF mean?
It marks the ball penetrating the hardened surface and exposing the fresh metal underneath, so the COF serves as an indicator of failure of the protective surface layer.
Which blade performed best?
Sample A: its COF stayed low (about 0.1 rising to 0.25) for 1600 revolutions before climbing to about 0.7, against breakthrough after 900 revolutions for Sample B and 80 for Sample C.
How much material did each blade lose?
Wear volumes were 0.13 mm³ for Sample A, 0.23 mm³ for Sample B and 0.32 mm³ for Sample C, with track depths of 34.8, 46.5 and 47.9 µm.
Why is low friction important for blades?
A low surface friction reduces the interaction of the blade with the object being cut, reducing tool wear and improving cutting efficiency.



