Application Note | High-Load Wear

Wear-Resistant Coating Evaluation by High-Load Tribometer

Ranking Hard Valve Coatings Under 100 N, Including Counter-Ball Wear

High-load pin-on-disk wear test setup

Research & Experimental Testing

Duanjie Li

Visual Design & Editorial

Andrew Shore

Introduction

A valve is used to regulate, direct or control the flow of a fluid such as gases, liquids, fluidized solids, or slurries. Valves are widely applied in virtually every industrial sector including water and sewage processing, upstream oil and gas, downstream and chemical processing, mining and minerals processing, nuclear power, hydro power and countless others. Valves are often exposed to high stress levels at the contact and extreme application environments combining wear, corrosion, high temperature, etc. Therefore, protective coatings are applied to extend the lifetime of the valves and to cut the cost and time of repair and replacement.

Importance of Wear Evaluation at High Loads

A number of techniques have been applied to deposit hard valve coatings, such as high velocity oxygen fuel spraying (HVOF), plasma transferred arc welding (PTA), laser cladding, physical vapor deposition (PVD) and others. These coatings possess superior wear resistance under conditions of high pressure and stress concentration. Reliable tribological evaluation under a high load is hence critical to simulate and compare the wear behaviors of different valve coatings in a controlled and monitored manner and to select the best candidate for the targeted industry.

Conventional pin-on-disc tribometers usually have a load capacity below 100 N, which makes it difficult to simulate severe service conditions under high pressure. Moreover, it may take days or even weeks to test one sample using a low load tribometer due to the superior wear resistance of the test sample.

ℹ️ Learn more about friction and wear testing lab services.

Measurement Objective

The NANOVEA Macro Tribometer is designed with high torque capability for loads up to 500 N. In this study, we simulated and compared the wear behaviors of valve coatings under high loads to showcase the capacity of the NANOVEA Macro Tribometer in quantitatively evaluating the wear properties of materials such as wear rate and coefficient of friction.

NANOVEA T2000 High Load

Pneumatic Tribometer

NANOVEA T2000 high load pneumatic tribometer
Large alumina ball loaded on a coated disc in the high-load tribometer
Fig. 1: Setup of the high load wear test.

Test Procedure

The coefficient of friction, COF, and the wear resistance of two wear-resistant valve coatings and the bare metal substrate were evaluated by the NANOVEA Macro Tribometer. An Al2O3 ball (10 mm diameter) was used as the counter material. The wear track and the Al2O3 ball were examined using the NANOVEA 3D non-contact profilometer after the tests. The test parameters are summarized in Table 1.

Please note that the Al2O3 ball as a counter material was used as an example in this study. Any solid material with different shapes can be applied using a custom fixture to simulate the performance of different material couplings under actual application conditions.

Test parameterValue
Normal force100 N
Rotational speed100 rpm
Duration of test30 min (coating), 3 min (substrate)
Wear track radius10 mm
Ball materialAl₂O₃
Ball diameter10 mm
LubricantN/A
AtmosphereAir
Temperature24 °C (room)
Humidity40%

Table 1: Test parameters of the wear measurements.

The wear rate, K, was evaluated using the formula K = V/(F × s) = A/(F × n), where V is the worn volume, F is the normal load, s is the sliding distance, A is the cross-sectional area of the wear track, and n is the number of revolutions. Wear track profiles and wear scars of the balls were evaluated by the NANOVEA Optical Profilometer, and the wear track morphology was examined using an optical microscope.

Results and Discussion

The NANOVEA Macro Tribometer was employed to measure the COF and wear rate of the valve coatings using a high load of 100 N and a large contact area in order to better simulate the application conditions of the valves. Wear rate is a vital factor for determining the service lifetime of the valves, while a low friction is desirable to improve equipment performance and efficiency and to avoid damaging issues caused by excessive friction such as galling, deposit formation, or over-tightened packing. Fig. 2 compares the evolution of COF during the tests. Due to the substantial difference in wear resistance between the test coatings and substrate, the substrate was tested for 3 min, compared to 30 min for the two coatings. The two valve coatings show a comparable COF of ~0.6 throughout the wear test. The substrate exhibits a slightly higher average COF of ~0.65 after the run-in period of the first 30 sec.

COF over time for Coating 1, Coating 2 and the substrate, the coatings near 0.6 over 30 minutes
Fig. 2: Evolution of COF during the wear tests of (a) Coating 1, (b) Coating 2 and (c) the substrate. Note: the substrate was tested for 3 min, compared to 30 min for the two coatings.

Fig. 3 compares the wear track profiles after the tests measured by the NANOVEA non-contact optical profilometer, and Table 2 summarizes the results of the wear track analysis. Fig. 4 shows the wear tracks of the test samples under the optical microscope. It can be observed that Coating 2 exhibits a much larger wear track compared to Coating 1 after the 30 min wear test. The wear rate of Coating 1 is 1.2E-04 mm³/N m, which is about nine times lower compared to Coating 2. The wear track depths of Coating 1 and Coating 2 are 29 and 160 µm, respectively. Since the coatings have a thickness of 300 µm, the wear rate calculated here reflects the wear resistance of the coatings. The substrate has a wide and rough wear track after the three min wear test. The formation of such a peculiar wear track on the substrate is further analyzed by 3D scan of the wear scar on the counter material, the Al2O3 ball.

Wear track cross-section profiles: shallow for Coating 1, deep and wide for Coating 2, wide and rough for the substrate
Fig. 3: Wear track profiles after the tests: (a) Coating 1 after 30 min, (b) Coating 2 after 30 min and (c) the substrate after 3 min.
SampleMaximum depth (µm)Area of wear loss (µm²)Wear rate (mm³/N m)
Coating 1293.6E+041.2E-04
Coating 21603.5E+051.1E-03
Substrate365.1E+041.7E-03

Table 2: Result summary of wear track analysis.

Low and high magnification micrographs of the wear tracks on Coating 1, Coating 2 and the substrate
Fig. 4: Wear tracks of (a) Coating 1, (b) Coating 2 and (c) the substrate under the optical microscope.

Fig. 5 displays the 3D wear scar morphology on the Al2O3 balls against the two coatings and the substrate after the wear tests. The volume loss and maximum height loss of the balls are summarized in Table 3 as calculated using the NANOVEA analysis software. Coating 1, which possesses the best wear resistance among the tested samples, creates a wear scar with a volume loss of 0.073 mm³ on the Al2O3 ball, compared to 0.149 mm³ for Coating 2. In comparison, the Al2O3 ball against the substrate after only a three min wear test exhibits a big flattened wear scar with a volume loss of 1.510 mm³. This is attributed to the formation of a large amount of abrasive debris removed from the substrate during the wear test, which in turn substantially accelerated the wear rate of both the substrate and the Al2O3 ball. As a consequence, a wide and rough wear track was quickly generated on the substrate in three min.

This finding demonstrates the significant enhancement of wear resistance by the valve coatings compared to the metal substrate. The formation of abrasive debris plays an important role in the wear behavior of both the test sample and the counter material. Other materials with different shapes besides the Al2O3 ball can also be applied as counter materials to simulate and compare the wear performance of different material couplings under actual application conditions, e.g. high temperature, corrosion, lubrication, etc.

3D view of the ball wear scar after the test against Coating 1, with a small flat spot
Fig. 5: Wear scar on the Al₂O₃ ball against (a) Coating 1.
3D view of the ball wear scar after the test against Coating 2
Fig. 5: Wear scar on the Al₂O₃ ball against (b) Coating 2.
3D view of the ball wear scar after the test against the substrate, with a large flattened area
Fig. 5: Wear scar on the Al₂O₃ ball against (c) the substrate.
BallVolume loss (mm³)Max. height loss (mm)
Ball against Coating 10.0730.078
Ball against Coating 20.1490.104
Ball against Substrate1.5100.323

Table 3: Summary of wear scar analysis on the Al₂O₃ balls after the tests.

Conclusion

The wear resistance of valves under high pressure and concentrated stress plays a vital role in their service performance. Valve coatings can significantly extend the lifetime of the valves under high stress conditions and reduce the time and cost of valve repair or replacement.

The NANOVEA Macro Tribometer is designed with high torque capability for loads up to 500 N and a precisely controlled motor for rotational speeds from 0.01 to 2000 rpm. It offers repeatable wear and friction testing using ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, with optional high temperature wear and lubrication modules available in one pre-integrated system. This range allows users to simulate different severe work environments of the valves, including high stress, wear and high temperature, and select the best candidate for the targeted industrial applications. It also provides an ideal tool to quantitatively assess the tribological behaviors of superior wear resistant materials under high loads.

The NANOVEA 3D non-contact profilometer enables precise wear volume measurement and offers a tool to analyze the detailed morphology of the wear tracks, providing more insight into the fundamental understanding of wear mechanisms.

Frequently Asked Questions About High-Load Wear Testing

Why test valve coatings at high load?

Valves see high contact stress combined with wear, corrosion and heat. Conventional pin-on-disc tribometers usually stay below 100 N, which makes severe service conditions hard to simulate, and testing highly wear-resistant coatings at low load can take days or weeks.

How were the coatings tested?

Pin-on-disc wear at 100 N and 100 rpm on a 10 mm radius with a 10 mm Al₂O₃ ball, dry, in air at 24 °C and 40% humidity, for 30 minutes on the coatings and 3 minutes on the bare substrate.

Which coating performed best?

Coating 1, with a wear rate of 1.2E-04 mm³/N m and a 29 µm deep track, about nine times lower than Coating 2 at 1.1E-03 mm³/N m and 160 µm; both stayed within their 300 µm thickness.

How did friction compare?

Both coatings ran at a comparable COF of about 0.6; the substrate averaged about 0.65 after a 30 second run-in.

Why did the bare substrate wear so badly?

It produced large amounts of abrasive debris that accelerated wear of both the substrate and the ball: in only 3 minutes the ball lost 1.510 mm³, against 0.073 mm³ and 0.149 mm³ against the two coatings over 30 minutes.

Can the counter material match a real valve contact?

Yes. The Al₂O₃ ball is an example; any solid material in different shapes can be mounted with a custom fixture, and tests can add high temperature, corrosion or lubrication.

Need to Rank Hard Coatings?