Application Note | Coating Friction

Self-Cleaning Glass Coating Friction Measurement

How a Low Surface Energy Coating Changes Friction in Dry and Wet Contact

Friction stylus on coated glass

Research & Experimental Testing

Duanjie Li

Visual Design & Editorial

Andrew Shore

Introduction

Self-cleaning glass coating possesses a low surface energy that repels both water and oils. Such a coating creates an easy-clean and non-stick glass surface that protects it against grime, dirt and staining. The easy-clean coating substantially cuts the water and energy usage on glass cleaning. It does not require harsh and toxic chemical detergents, making it an eco-friendly choice for a wide variety of residential and commercial applications, such as mirrors, shower glasses, windows and windshields.

Importance of Friction for Self-Cleaning Glass Coating

Self-cleaning glass relies on the low surface energy coating to avoid dirt and mineral buildup. The hydrophobic surface creates a very high static water contact angle and low roll-off angle. The water and oil based dirt is therefore carried away by the rolling water droplets formed on the coating surface. There is a correlation between surface energy and coefficient of friction (COF): higher surface energy (greater wettability) usually leads to higher COF. A reliable and quantitative measurement of the COF allows one to compare the surface energy of the self-cleaning glass and investigate the solid–liquid interactions at the contact surface under different conditions.

Measurement Objective

In this study, we measure the friction between the self-cleaning glass coating and the stylus with dry and wet contact under different loads using the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester.

NANOVEA PB1000 Large Platform

Mechanical Tester

Nanoindenter and scratch tester platform NANOVEA PB1000 with nano and micro modules
Flat stylus of the mechanical tester resting on a glass sample
Fig. 1: Friction test setup.

Test Procedure

The self-cleaning glass coating was professionally coated on a tempered glass sheet sample. The coefficient of friction, COF, of the self-cleaning glass against a flat steel stylus (6 mm diameter) covered by a Kimwipe was measured using the Micro Module of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester. The stylus had been soaked in water to create a wet contact. The stylus applied a constant load on the glass sample and slid at a constant speed of 30 mm/min. The total sliding distance is 30 mm. The COF was also measured with a dry contact condition for comparison. The test parameters are summarized in Table 1.

Please note that the counter material in this study was used as an example, any solid material with different shapes can be applied using custom fixture to simulate the actual situation.

Test parameterValue
SampleCoated self-cleaning glass, uncoated glass
Normal force1, 2, 3, 4, 5 N
Speed30 mm/min
Duration of test1 min

Table 1: Test parameters of the friction measurement.

Results and Discussion

The COF of the Coated and Uncoated glass samples against the stylus with a dry and a wet contact are plotted in Fig. 2. The average COF at different loads is compared in Fig. 3. The Coated sample exhibits slightly decreased COF as the load increases from 1 to 5 N: the COF progressively decreases from 0.17 to 0.09 and from 0.21 to 0.12, respectively, for the friction test with a dry contact and with a wet contact. In comparison, the Uncoated Sample exhibits a similar frictional behavior with a dry contact: its COF gradually decreases from 0.11 to 0.07 as the applied load increases from 1 to 5 N. However, when the wet stylus slides on the uncoated glass, the average COF significantly increases to ~0.45 for the tests performed in the whole load range between 1 and 5 N. This clearly demonstrates the significant effect of the contact condition on the COF measurement. The self-cleaning glass coating possesses a lower surface energy under the wet contact, leading to lower measured COF in this study.

Thanks to the combination of the precise force measurement and the fast position control, the stylus position can be promptly adjusted to keep a constant applied load, allowing us to perform reliable COF measurement under various test conditions.

Four charts of COF against position at 1 to 5 N for coated and uncoated glass, dry and wet
Fig. 2: COF of the (a) coated and (b) uncoated glass with a dry contact, and the (c) coated and (d) uncoated glass with a wet contact.
Average COF against load for the four conditions, with uncoated wet near 0.45 and the others between 0.07 and 0.21
Fig. 3: Average COF of the coated and uncoated glass samples at different loads.

Conclusion

In this study, we showcased the capacity of the Micro Module of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester in measuring the coefficient of friction of self-cleaning glass coatings in a controlled and monitored manner. This friction measurement allows users to quantitatively assess the COF of the materials under different loads and test conditions and select the best candidate for the applications. The self-cleaning glass coating shows a lower friction than the uncoated glass in the wet contact condition, thanks to its low surface energy.

The Nano, Micro or Macro modules of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester all include ISO and ASTM compliant indentation, scratch and wear tester modes, providing the widest and most user friendly range of testing available in a single system. The NANOVEA Mechanical Tester provides comprehensive measurements of various mechanical properties, including hardness, Young’s modulus, fracture toughness, adhesion, wear resistance and many others.

Frequently Asked Questions About Self-Cleaning Glass Friction Testing

Why measure the friction of a self-cleaning coating?

Self-cleaning glass relies on a low surface energy coating that makes water bead and roll off, carrying dirt away. Higher surface energy usually means higher friction, so a reliable COF measurement helps compare coatings and study solid–liquid interactions.

How was friction measured?

A flat 6 mm steel stylus covered with a Kimwipe, dry or soaked in water, slid over the glass at 30 mm/min for 30 mm at constant loads of 1 to 5 N, on the Micro Module of the Mechanical Tester.

What did the coated glass show?

Its COF decreased slightly with load: from 0.17 to 0.09 with a dry contact and from 0.21 to 0.12 with a wet contact.

How did uncoated glass compare?

Dry, it behaved similarly, from 0.11 to 0.07; with the wet stylus its COF rose to about 0.45 over the whole 1 to 5 N range, showing how strongly the contact condition affects friction.

How is a constant load kept during sliding?

Precise force measurement combined with fast position control adjusts the stylus position promptly to keep the applied load constant.

Can other counter materials be used?

Yes. The stylus here is an example; any solid material and shape can be mounted with a custom fixture to simulate the actual situation.

Need to Measure Coating Friction?