Application Note | Thin Film Scratch Testing
Scratch Testing on Multi-Layered Thin Film
Critical Loads of Two Delaminations and Substrate Cracking, Identified Under the Microscope

Research & Experimental Testing
Frank Liu
Visual Design & Editorial
Andrew Shore
Introduction
Coatings are used extensively throughout multiple industries to preserve the underlying layers, to create electronic devices, or to improve surface properties of materials. Due to their numerous uses coatings are extensively studied, but their mechanical properties can be difficult to understand. Failure of coatings can occur in the micro/nanometer range from surface-atmosphere interaction, cohesive failure, and poor substrate-interface adhesion. A consistent method to test for coating failures is scratch testing. By applying a progressively increasing load, cohesive (e.g. cracking) and adhesive (e.g. delamination) failures of coatings can be quantitatively compared.
Importance of Scratch Testing on Multilayered Coatings
Scratch testing is a modern destructive testing method to determine the adhesive and cohesive properties of coatings. Adhesive properties refer to how well the substrate binds to the coating at the interface, while cohesive properties refer to failure within the coating region. These properties of coatings are important for failure analysis and can be used to compare results from different manufacturing processes. Most common are single coating/substrate samples. Consistent data can still be obtained from multi-layered samples via scratch testing with NANOVEA’s Mechanical Tester.
ℹ️ Learn more about scratch testing lab services.

Measurement Objective
Scratch testing was conducted on a sample coated with multiple thin layers of materials on top of a silicon substrate. Failures were identified visually using an optical microscope.
Test Conditions and Procedure
| Test parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Load type | Progressive |
| Initial load | 0.02 N |
| Final load | 2 N |
| Loading rate | 10 N/min |
| Scratch length | 3 mm |
| Scratching speed | 15 mm/min |
| Indenter geometry | 120° cone |
| Indenter material (tip) | Diamond |
| Indenter tip radius | 20 µm |
Table 1: Scratch test parameters for the multi-layered sample.
Results
The scratch tests done on the sample consistently show two adhesive failures. The first delamination of the first coating occurs at 0.039 ± 0.012N. The second delamination point occurs at 1.068 ± 0.102N. No other delamination points were identifiable under an optical microscope. In addition to the two adhesive failures, a cohesive failure of the silicon wafer was also found to occur consistently at 1.779 ± 0.043N.
| Scratch | First delamination (N) | Second delamination (N) | Cohesive failure (N) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.025 | 1.157 | 1.727 |
| 2 | 0.055 | 1.123 | 1.833 |
| 3 | 0.038 | 0.925 | 1.778 |
| Average | 0.039 | 1.068 | 1.779 |
| Standard deviation | 0.012 | 0.102 | 0.043 |
Table 2: Result summary of the scratch tests on the multi-layered sample.




Table 3: Failure analysis of the scratch test on the multi-layered sample.

The friction graph above, figure 1, shows the data collected over the course of the scratch. The data is often used as a supplement to optical inspection, but did not show clear signs of critical failures for our sample (see the means for critical load determination below). With our precise stage movements, we can identify the critical load of the failure by mapping an image of the scratch with all the data collected, including load. By matching the image with the data, the load, depth, and frictional force can be pinpointed at various positions in the scratch.
Descriptions of the failures and how they were identified are listed in Table 3.
Conclusion
The controlled and monitored fashion in which the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester conducts its scratch test was able to create clear, consistent delaminations on a sample with multiple layers of thin films. In three different scratches, the sample clearly displays two points of delamination at 0.039 ± 0.012N and 1.068 ± 0.102N. Cohesive failure was found to be at 1.779 ± 0.043N. These failures were able to be clearly distinguished in all scratches conducted.
Theory of Scratch Testing
Principle
The scratch testing method is a quantitative test in which critical loads at which failures appear in the samples are used to evaluate the relative cohesive or adhesive properties of a coating or the scratch resistance of a bulk material. During the test, scratches are made on the sample with a sphero-conical stylus which is drawn at a constant speed across the sample, under a constant load, or, more commonly, a progressive load with a fixed loading rate. Sphero-conical styluses are available with different radii (which describes the “sharpness” of the stylus). Common radii are from 20 to 200 µm for micro/macro scratch tests, and 1 to 20 µm for nano scratch tests.
When performing a progressive load test, the critical load is defined as the smallest load at which a recognizable failure occurs. In the case of a constant load test, the critical load corresponds to the load at which a regular occurrence of such failure along the track is observed.

Comments on the Critical Load
The scratch test is a quantitative test with high repeatability. The critical load depends on the mechanical strength (adhesion, cohesion) of a combined coating-substrate system but also on several other parameters. Some of them are directly related to the test itself, while others are related to the coating-substrate system.
Test parameters affecting critical load: loading rate; scratching speed; indenter tip radius; indenter material (and also indenter tip wear).
Sample specific parameters affecting critical load: friction coefficient between surface and indenter; internal stresses in the material; substrate hardness and roughness; coating hardness and roughness; coating thickness.
By keeping the test parameters constant one can obtain very repeatable data to quantifiably compare samples.
Means for Critical Load Determination
Microscopic observation is the most reliable method to detect surface damage. This technique is able to differentiate between cohesive failure within the coating and adhesive failure at the interface of the coating-substrate system.
The friction force recording enables the force fluctuations along the scratch to be studied and correlated to the failures observed under the microscope. Typically, a failure in the sample will result in a change (a step, or a change in slope) in coefficient of friction. Frictional responses to failures are very specific to the coating-substrate system in study.
The depth sensor recording can also sometimes indicate where a failure occurs. Typically, a significant fall in the depth will indicate that the indenter has broken through one layer of a sample down to the next. The depth recording can also be used to study deformation of a sample surface. Plastic and elastic deformation can be studied by performing pre- and post-scans of the scratch.
Frequently Asked Questions About Scratch Testing Multilayer Films
Can scratch testing evaluate a multilayer coating?
Yes. Single coating/substrate samples are most common, but consistent data can still be obtained from multi-layered samples. Here three scratches on a multilayer film on silicon showed the same two delaminations and one cohesive failure every time.
What critical loads were measured?
The first coating delaminated at 0.039 ± 0.012 N, the second delamination occurred at 1.068 ± 0.102 N, and the silicon wafer failed cohesively at 1.779 ± 0.043 N.
How were the failures identified?
Under an optical microscope: both delaminations by a change in color as underlying layers became exposed, and the cohesive failure by a change in texture on the surface.
Why not rely on the friction graph?
The friction data is often used as a supplement to optical inspection, but here it did not show clear signs of the critical failures. Mapping the scratch image to the recorded load, depth and friction pinpoints the critical load at each failure.
What affects the critical load?
Test parameters (loading rate, scratching speed, indenter tip radius and material) and sample parameters (friction, internal stresses, substrate and coating hardness and roughness, coating thickness). Keeping test parameters constant gives very repeatable, comparable data.
Which scratch parameters were used?
A progressive load from 0.02 to 2 N at 10 N/min over a 3 mm scratch at 15 mm/min, with a 120° diamond cone of 20 µm tip radius.



