Application Note | Rock Tribology
Rock Tribology Using NANOVEA Tribometer
Friction, Wear Rate and Hardness of Limestone and Marble for Drilling and Building Stone

Research & Experimental Testing
Duanjie Li
Visual Design & Editorial
Andrew Shore
Introduction
Rocks are composed of grains of minerals. The type and abundance of these minerals, as well as the chemical bonding strength between the mineral grains, determine the mechanical and tribological properties of the rocks. Depending on the geological rock cycles, rocks can undergo transformations and are typically classified into three major types: igneous, sedimentary, and metamorphic. These rocks exhibit different mineral and chemical compositions, permeabilities, and particle sizes, and such characteristics contribute to their varied wear resistance. Rock tribology explores the wear and friction behaviors of rocks in various geological and environmental conditions.
Importance of Rock Tribology
Various types of wear against rocks, including abrasion and friction, occur during the drilling process of wells, leading to significant direct and consequential losses attributed to the repair and replacement of drill bits and cutting tools. Therefore, the study of drillability, boreability, cuttability, and abrasivity of rocks is critical in the oil, gas, and mining industries. Rock tribology research plays a pivotal role in the selection of the most efficient and cost-effective drilling strategies, thereby enhancing overall efficiency and contributing to the conservation of materials, energy, and the environment. Additionally, minimizing surface friction is highly advantageous in reducing the interaction between the drilling bit and the rock, resulting in decreased tool wear and improved drilling/cutting efficiency.
ℹ️ Learn more about friction and wear testing lab services.
Measurement Objective
In this study, we simulated and compared the tribological properties of two types of rocks to showcase the capacity of the NANOVEA T50 Tribometer in measuring the coefficient of friction and wear rate of rocks in a controlled and monitored manner.
Test Procedure
The coefficient of friction, COF, and the wear resistance of two rock samples were evaluated by the NANOVEA T50 Tribometer using the Pin-on-Disc Wear Module. An Al2O3 ball (6 mm diameter) was used as the counter material. The wear track was examined using the NANOVEA Non-Contact Profilometer after the tests. The test parameters are summarized in Table 1.
The wear rate, K, was evaluated using the formula K = V/(F × s) = A/(F × n), where V is the worn volume, F is the normal load, s is the sliding distance, A is the cross-sectional area of the wear track, and n is the number of revolutions. Surface roughness and wear track profiles were evaluated with the NANOVEA Optical Profilometer, and the wear track morphology was examined using an optical microscope.
Please note that the Al2O3 ball as a counter material was used as an example in this study. Any solid material with different shapes can be applied using a custom fixture to simulate the actual application situation.

| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Samples | Limestone, Marble |
| Normal force | 10 N |
| Speed | 100 rpm |
| Wear ring radius | 5 mm |
| Test duration | 10 min |
| Counter material | Al₂O₃ ball, 6 mm diameter |
Table 1: Test parameters of the wear tests.
Results and Discussion
The hardness (H) and elastic modulus (E) of the limestone and marble samples are compared in Fig. 1, utilizing the Micro Indentation module of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester. The limestone sample exhibited lower H and E values, measuring 0.53 and 25.9 GPa, respectively, in contrast to marble, which recorded values of 1.07 GPa for H and 49.6 GPa for E. The relatively higher variability in the H and E values observed in the limestone sample can be attributed to its greater surface inhomogeneity, stemming from its granulated and porous characteristics.

The evolution of the COF during the wear tests of the two rock samples is depicted in Fig. 2. The limestone initially experiences a rapid increase in COF to approximately 0.8 at the beginning of the wear test, maintaining this value throughout the duration of the test. This abrupt change in COF can be attributed to the penetration of the Al2O3 ball into the rock sample, resulting from a rapid wear and roughening process occurring at the contact face within the wear track. In contrast, the marble sample exhibits a notable increase in COF to higher values after approximately 5 meters of sliding distance, signifying its superior wear resistance when compared to the limestone.

Fig. 3 compares cross-sectional profiles of the limestone and marble samples after the wear tests, and Table 2 summarizes the results of the wear track analysis. Fig. 4 shows the wear tracks of the samples under the optical microscope. The wear track evaluation aligns with the COF evolution observation: the marble sample, which maintains a low COF for a longer period, exhibits a lower wear rate of 0.0046 mm³/N m, compared to 0.0353 mm³/N m for the limestone. The superior mechanical properties of marble contribute to its better wear resistance than limestone.

| Sample | Valley area (µm²) | Valley depth (µm) | Wear rate (mm³/N m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limestone | 35.3 ± 5.9 × 10⁴ | 229 ± 24 | 0.0353 |
| Marble | 4.6 ± 1.2 × 10⁴ | 61 ± 15 | 0.0046 |
Table 2: Result summary of wear track analysis.

Conclusion
In this study, we showcased the capacity of the NANOVEA Tribometer in evaluating the coefficient of friction and wear resistance of two rock samples, namely marble and limestone, in a controlled and monitored manner. The superior mechanical properties of marble contribute to its exceptional wear resistance. This property makes it challenging to drill or cut in the oil and gas industry. Conversely, it significantly extends its lifetime when used as a high-quality building material, such as floor tiles.
NANOVEA Tribometers offer precise and repeatable wear and friction testing capabilities, adhering to ISO and ASTM standards in both rotative and linear modes, with optional modules for high-temperature wear, lubrication, and tribocorrosion, all integrated into one system.
Frequently Asked Questions About Rock Tribology
Why test rock tribology?
Abrasion and friction against rock during drilling wear out drill bits and cutting tools; studying drillability, cuttability and abrasivity helps choose efficient, cost-effective drilling strategies in the oil, gas and mining industries.
How were the rocks tested?
Pin-on-disk wear on a NANOVEA T50 tribometer with a 6 mm Al₂O₃ ball under 10 N, at 100 rpm on a 5 mm radius for 10 minutes; wear tracks were measured with a non-contact profilometer and examined by optical microscope.
Which rock wore less?
Marble, at 0.0046 mm³/N m against 0.0353 mm³/N m for limestone; its wear-track depth was 61 ± 15 µm against 229 ± 24 µm.
How did friction differ?
Limestone jumped to a COF of about 0.8 almost immediately as the ball penetrated and roughened the track; marble stayed low for about 5 m of sliding before rising.
Why is marble more wear resistant?
Its higher hardness and modulus, 1.07 GPa and 49.6 GPa against 0.53 GPa and 25.9 GPa for the granular, porous limestone.
Can the counter material match a real tool?
Yes. The Al₂O₃ ball is an example; any solid material in different shapes can be mounted with a custom fixture to simulate the actual application.



