Application Note | Spring Rate Testing

Nano Mechanical Characterization of Spring Constants

Measuring the Spring Rate of Small Coil Springs from Load-Depth Curves with Sub-mN to 400 N Loads

Motorcycle rear suspension coil spring

Research & Experimental Testing

Xavier Herrera-Keehn & Jocelyn Esparza

Visual Design & Editorial

Andrew Shore

Introduction

A spring’s ability to store mechanical energy has a long history of use. From bows for hunting to locks for doors, spring technology has been around for many centuries. Nowadays we rely on springs, be it from mattresses, pens, or automotive suspension, as they play a vital role in our daily lives. With such a wide variety of use and designs, the ability to quantify their mechanical properties is necessary.

Determining Spring Constant with the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester

One important mechanical property of springs is their ability to compress or stretch when a load is applied, this is quantified by the spring constant. The spring constant can be found by looking at the slope of the load vs. depth curve; a linear spring will follow Hooke’s Law: F = −kx, where F is the force applied, x is the spring’s displacement, and k is the spring constant. With the variety of modules offered with the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester, loads ranging from sub mN to 400 N can be applied onto a spring. The NANOVEA Mechanical Tester can precisely record the changes in depth as it applies a load onto the spring, as well as recording a spring’s deflection up to 20 mm. Keep in mind as the spring constant increases, higher loads will be needed to accurately obtain the spring constant.

Chrome coil spring of a motorcycle rear shock absorber beside the wheel

Measurement Objectives

The objective of this application note is to demonstrate the versatility of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester by measuring the spring rate of three distinct coil springs with the Nano Module.

NANOVEA PB1000 Large Platform

Mechanical Tester

Nanoindenter and scratch tester platform NANOVEA PB1000 with nano and micro modules

Measurement Parameters

Small coil spring under the flat indenter of the PB1000 nano module
Fig. 1: Sample being tested on the NANOVEA PB1000.
Test parameterAll samples
Maximum force150 mN
Loading rate300 mN/min
Unloading rate300 mN/min
Indenter typeFlat

Table 1: Test parameters used.

Three small steel coil springs of different pitch and length
Samples of springs tested.

Results and Discussion

Shown below is the data for the three spring samples, three tests were performed on each spring and their respective spring constants were found. A linear trend was fitted onto the loading curve to obtain the slope, the slope being the spring constant. The R² value describes how well the linear trend was fitted to the dataset (1 being a perfect fit).

Spring 1

Spring 1Spring constant k (mN/µm)
Test 10.9358
Test 20.9319
Test 30.9344
Average0.9340
Standard deviation0.001613

Table 2: Spring constants of Spring 1 from three tests.

Load versus depth curve of Spring 1, Test 3, with a linear fit y = 0.9344x − 1.1428, R² = 0.9999
Fig. 2: Load vs depth for Spring 1, Test 3 (y = 0.9344x − 1.1428, R² = 0.9999).

Spring 2

Spring 2Spring constant k (mN/µm)
Test 11.5057
Test 21.5149
Test 31.5224
Average1.5143
Standard deviation0.00683

Table 3: Spring constants of Spring 2 from three tests.

Load versus depth curve of Spring 2, Test 3, with a linear fit y = 1.5224x − 1.361, R² = 1
Fig. 3: Load vs depth for Spring 2, Test 3 (y = 1.5224x − 1.361, R² = 1).

Spring 3

Spring 3Spring constant k (mN/µm)
Test 12.2293
Test 22.2518
Test 32.2396
Average2.2402
Standard deviation0.009196

Table 4: Spring constants of Spring 3 from three tests.

Load versus depth curve of Spring 3, Test 3, with a linear fit y = 2.2396x − 4.6101, R² = 0.9991
Fig. 4: Load vs depth for Spring 3, Test 3 (y = 2.2396x − 4.6101, R² = 0.9991).

As you can see, the data for each of the three coil springs is repeatable and consistent, with the highest standard deviation being 0.009196 mN/µm for the third spring, but this is to be expected as the spring constant becomes greater.

Conclusion

Since springs are used in many different industries, quantifying their mechanical energy is necessary. In this study we were able to accurately and precisely measure the spring constant for 3 different coil springs. With the large variety of modules offered with the NANOVEA PB1000 Mechanical Tester, spring deflection up to 20 mm can be recorded.

Coil springs in the bogie of a railway car on the track

Frequently Asked Questions About Spring Constant Measurement

What is a spring constant?

The spring constant k quantifies a spring’s ability to compress or stretch under load. A linear spring follows Hooke’s law, F = −kx, where F is the applied force and x the displacement, so k is the slope of the load versus depth curve.

How is a spring constant measured on a mechanical tester?

The tester applies a controlled load to the spring with a flat indenter while precisely recording depth, and a linear trend fitted to the loading curve gives the slope, the spring constant. Here springs were loaded to 150 mN at 300 mN/min.

What spring constants were measured?

Three coil springs averaged 0.9340, 1.5143 and 2.2402 mN/µm over three tests each, with standard deviations of 0.001613, 0.00683 and 0.009196 mN/µm.

How repeatable are the measurements?

Very repeatable: the largest standard deviation was 0.009196 mN/µm, for the stiffest spring, which is expected as the spring constant increases. The linear fits had R² values from 0.9991 to 1.

What range of springs can be tested?

NANOVEA mechanical tester modules apply loads from sub-mN to 400 N and record spring deflection up to 20 mm. Stiffer springs need higher loads to obtain their constant accurately.

Which NANOVEA instrument was used?

The NANOVEA PB1000 Mechanical Tester with its nano module, a multi-module platform for scratch, indentation and wear testing.

Need Reliable Spring Constant Testing?