Application Note | Nanoindentation Mapping
Mechanical Mapping of a PCB Using the Broadview Map Selection Tool
Selecting Indentation Sites Directly on a Stitched Microscope Map for Fast, Precise PCB Testing

Research & Experimental Testing
Duanjie Li
Visual Design & Editorial
Andrew Shore
Introduction
We’ve all heard the term, time is money. Which is why many companies constantly seek methods of expediting and improving various processes. When it comes to indentation testing, speed, efficiency and precision can be integrated into a quality control or R&D process when using one of our NANOVEA Mechanical Testers.
Printed circuit boards (PCB) are widely used on a variety of electronic devices, including phones, radios, radar and computer systems. Mechanical integrity of the PCB is a key factor in manufacturing failure free product. The scale-down of the PCB production technology into the micron/nanometer level not only enables increased number of electronic components on a single board, but also brings challenges to defect inspection and quality control of the PCB.
Why Nanoindentation Matters for Mechanical Inspection of PCBs
The thinner wires and more complex structure of the electronic circuit on the advanced PCB demands high-precision mechanical integrity inspection. Nanoindentation is widely applied to measure the mechanical behaviors of materials at small scalesi, ii. In order to accurately evaluate the mechanical properties of different wires and electronic components on the PCB, high precision position control of the nanoindentation location is critical. A reliable and user-friendly procedure of nanoindentation testing can significantly facilitate the quality control and R&D of advanced PCB. In addition, the small indentation force applied using the nanoindentation technique provides an ideal non-destructive mechanical testing solution to prevent damages to PCB under the test.
ℹ️ Learn more about nanoindentation lab services for electronics.
Measurement Objective
In this application, the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester, in Nanoindentation mode, is used to measure the mechanical properties of different locations of a PCB. We would like to showcase the capacity of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester in performing nanoindentation measurement on a PCB with high precision and user friendliness using the Broadview Map Selection Tool.
Test Conditions

The Broadview Map Selection Tool provides a user-friendly tool to observe and precisely select the intended area for mechanical testing. In this particular study, a map of 10×10 images were taken by the optical microscope integrated in the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester as shown in Fig. 2, in order to obtain a better observation of the overall area of interest on the PCB. Three representative areas on the PCB were directly selected on the image for nanoindentation mapping as numbered on Fig. 2. The nanoindentation mapping (3×3, spaced 50 µm apart, 9 indents in total) was performed under the test conditions summarized in Table 1.
The procedure set up by the Broadview Map Selection Tool can be saved and reapplied on other samples of the same geometry, so that the indentations at the same load and location will be automatically performed. This function substantially facilitates quality control of large batches of samples of the same geometry. Moreover, the Fastmap function of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester further accelerates the indentation tests.

| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Maximum force | 200 mN |
| Loading rate | 400 mN/min |
| Unloading rate | 400 mN/min |
| Indenter type | Berkovich |
| Mapping | 3 × 3 indents, 50 µm apart, at each of three areas |
Table 1: Test conditions of the nanoindentation.
Results and Discussion
The images of the 3×3 indentation matrix at the three selected areas are displayed in Fig. 3. We demonstrate that the excellent position control of the sample stage in the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester allows users to precisely pinpoint the target area on this image map for mechanical properties testing, i.e. 3×3 nanoindentation mapping. This makes measurement of the local mechanical properties at small scales substantially less time-consuming and more user friendly.


Fig. 3: Nanoindentations on the PCB: (a) Area A, (b) Area B, (c) Area C.
The representative load-displacement curves of the indentations are shown in Fig. 4, and the corresponding hardness and Young’s Modulus calculated using the Oliver and Pharr Methodiii are summarized and compared in Fig. 5. Area A possesses an average hardness of ~5.2 GPa, compared to ~0.91 GPa and ~0.59 GPa, respectively, for Areas B and C. It also has a higher Young’s modulus of 22.9 GPa.


Conclusion
In this study, we showcased the capacity of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester in performing nanoindentation mapping on target areas of a PCB using the Broadview Map Selection Tool. The precise position control allows users to directly select the areas of interest for nanoindentation on a large optical image array and perform accurate mechanical property measurements. The superior precision and repeatability of the nanoindentation tests is attributed to the piezo load control and direct load/displacement measurement of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester.
The Nano, Micro or Macro modules of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester all include ISO and ASTM compliant indentation, scratch and wear tester modes, providing the widest and most user friendly range of testing available in a single system. NANOVEA’s unmatched range is an ideal solution for determining the full range of mechanical properties of thin or thick, soft or hard coatings, films and substrates, including hardness, Young’s modulus, fracture toughness, adhesion, wear resistance and many others.
In addition, optional 3D non-contact profiler and AFM Module are available for high resolution 3D imaging of indentation, scratch and wear track in addition to other surface measurements such as roughness.

Appendix: Measurement Principle
Nanoindentation is based on the standards for instrumented indentation, ASTM E2546 and ISO 14577. It uses an established method where an indenter tip with a known geometry is driven into a specific site of the material to be tested, by applying an increasing normal load. When reaching a pre-set maximum value, the normal load is reduced until complete relaxation occurs. The load is applied by a piezo actuator and the load is measured in a controlled loop with a high sensitivity load cell. During the experiment the position of the indenter relative to the sample surface is precisely monitored with a high precision capacitive sensor.
The resulting load/displacement curves provide data specific to the mechanical nature of the material under examination. Established models are used to calculate quantitative hardness and modulus values for such data. Nanoindentation is especially suited to load and penetration depth measurements at nanometer scales and has the following specifications:
| Nano module specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Maximum displacement (dual range) | 50 µm or 250 µm |
| Depth resolution (theoretical) | 0.003 nm |
| Depth resolution (noise level) | 0.15 nm |
| Maximum force | 400 mN |
| Load resolution (theoretical) | 0.03 µN |
| Load resolution (noise floor) | 0.3 µN |
Table 2: Nanoindentation module specifications.
Analysis of the Indentation Curve
Following ASTM E2546 (ISO 14577), hardness and elastic modulus are determined through the load/displacement curve as in the example below.

H = Pmax / Ac
Young’s modulus. The reduced modulus, Er, is given by:Er = √π S / (2 √Ac)
which can be calculated having derived S and Ac from the indentation curve using the area function, Ac being the projected contact area. The Young’s modulus, E, can then be obtained from:
1/Er = (1 − ν²)/E + (1 − νi²)/Ei
where Ei and νi are the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the indenter and ν the Poisson’s ratio of the tested sample.
How are these calculated? A power-law fit through the upper 1/3 to 1/2 of the unloading data intersects the depth axis at ht. The stiffness, S, is given by the slope of this line. The contact depth, hc, is then calculated as:hc = hmax − 3Pmax / (4S)
The contact area Ac is calculated by evaluating the indenter area function. This function will depend on the diamond geometry and, at low loads, on an area correction. For perfect Berkovich and Vickers indenters, the area function is Ac = 24.5hc². For a Cube Corner indenter, the area function is Ac = 2.60hc². For a spherical indenter, the area function is Ac = 2πRhc, where R is the radius of the indenter.
Other possible measurements by the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester: stress-strain and yield stress, fracture toughness, compression strength, fatigue testing and many others.
References
i. Oliver, W. C.; Pharr, G. M., Journal of Materials Research, Volume 19, Issue 1, Jan 2004, pp. 3–20
ii. Schuh, C. A., Materials Today, Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2006, pp. 32–40
iii. Oliver, W. C.; Pharr, G. M., Journal of Materials Research, Volume 7, Issue 6, June 1992, pp. 1564–1583
Frequently Asked Questions About PCB Nanoindentation Mapping
Why use nanoindentation on printed circuit boards?
As PCB production scales down to micron and nanometer features, thinner wires and complex circuits demand high-precision mechanical inspection. Nanoindentation measures properties at small scales, and its small force makes it a non-destructive test that avoids damaging the board.
What is the Broadview Map Selection Tool?
A software feature that stitches a map of microscope images, here 10 × 10, so the user can view the whole area of interest and select test locations directly on the image. The tester’s precise stage then indents exactly at those sites.
Can the same test be repeated on many boards?
Yes. The procedure can be saved and reapplied to other samples of the same geometry, so indentations at the same load and location run automatically, which helps quality control of large batches. FastMap mode further accelerates testing.
What did the PCB indentation maps show?
Area A had an average hardness of ~5.2 GPa and a Young’s modulus of 22.9 GPa, compared with ~0.91 GPa and ~0.59 GPa hardness for Areas B and C.
How were the indentations performed?
A Berkovich tip loaded to 200 mN at 400 mN/min, in a 3 × 3 matrix spaced 50 µm apart at each of three selected areas, with hardness and modulus calculated by the Oliver and Pharr method.
Which NANOVEA instrument was used?
The NANOVEA Mechanical Tester in nanoindentation mode, with piezo load control and direct load and displacement measurement for precise, repeatable results.



