Application Note | Cosmetic Surface Finish

Surface Texture Effect on Luster of Anodized Aluminum

Why the Rougher Finish Looked Shinier: Plateau Size, Not Roughness Alone

Optical sensor scanning anodized aluminum

Research & Experimental Testing

Duanjie Li

Visual Design & Editorial

Andrew Shore

Introduction

Anodizing is an electrolytic passivation process commonly applied to convert aluminum to aluminum oxide. It can modify the surface texture and changes the microstructure of the metal near the surface. Such an anodized aluminum oxide layer is generally much stronger and more adherent than most types of paint and metal plating. It can significantly enhance corrosion and wear resistance and improve cosmetic effects of the products. Anodized aluminum is widely used on electronic devices and consumer products, such as cell phones, cameras, mp3 players and many others.

Importance of 3D Profilometry for Anodized Aluminum Inspection

The appearance of a product plays an important role in influencing consumer product choice. It communicates aesthetic and functional characteristics and makes an impression of the product quality. Roughness and texture of the anodized aluminum surface is critical in the final product appearance. A better understanding of the effect of surface texture, consistency and directional patterns on the product appearance allows optimizing the processing and control measures to obtain the best result. Quantifiable, precise and reliable surface inspection of anodized aluminum is needed to control surface parameters for endless applications of anodized aluminum. The NANOVEA 3D Non-Contact Profilometers utilize chromatic confocal technology with unique capability to precisely measure the sample surface.

ℹ️ Learn more about surface profiling lab services.

Measurement Objective

In this study, the NANOVEA ST400 non-contact profilometer is used to measure and compare two anodized aluminum samples with different surface finish. We showcase the capacity of the NANOVEA non-contact profilometer in providing precise 3D profile measurement and comprehensive in-depth analysis of surface finish.

NANOVEA ST400 Standard

Optical 3D Profilometer

NANOVEA ST400 modular optical profilometer for non-contact 3D surface measurement
Optical sensor of the profilometer above an anodized aluminum plate
Fig. 1: Optical sensor scanning on the surface of the anodized aluminum sample.

Results and Discussion

Sample 1 is more lustrous compared to Sample 2, making it more visually appealing and thus seemingly better quality. In order to understand the cause of such effect, the surfaces of Samples 1 and 2 under the optical microscope are compared in Fig. 2. Sample 1 appears to reflect more light under the same condition.

Micrographs of the two anodized surfaces, Sample 1 brighter
Fig. 2: The surface of (a) Sample 1 and (b) Sample 2 under the optical microscope.

The false color view and roughness of the two anodized aluminum samples are compared in Fig. 3. Sample 1 shows a relatively coarser surface texture with a higher roughness Sa of 3.94 µm, compared to an Sa of 2.65 µm for Sample 2. Such an observation seemingly contradicts common sense, where a smoother surface (with a lower roughness value) usually possesses higher reflectivity.

False-color height maps of the two anodized samples
Fig. 3: False color view of Sample 1 (left) and Sample 2 (right).
ISO 25178 parameterSample 1Sample 2
Sa (µm)3.942.65
Sq (µm)5.133.39
Sp (µm)17.911.9
Sv (µm)24.316.1
Sz (µm)42.328.0
Ssk−0.412−0.305
Sku4.143.62

Table 1: Roughness of the two anodized aluminum samples (from Fig. 3).

In order to further investigate the effect of the surface texture on the luster of the anodized aluminum, a more detailed 3D profile evaluation of these two anodized aluminum samples is performed and discussed in the following section. The 3D view and 2D profile of the two samples at a higher magnification are displayed in Fig. 4. It can be observed that both Sample 1 and Sample 2 have a rough surface. However, Sample 1 shows plateaus of larger sizes and flatter surface, which reflect more light compared to the small asperities on Sample 2. 2D profile analysis confirms this conclusion: although Sample 1 possesses a rougher surface due to the deeper pores between the plateaus, the plateaus show smoother micro texture.

3D views and profiles of the two samples at high magnification, Sample 1 with larger flat plateaus
Fig. 4: 3D and 2D profiles of the anodized aluminum samples (Sample 1 left, Sample 2 right).

Grain size analysis of the anodized aluminum samples is compared in Fig. 5. Each grain here represents a plateau on the sample surface. It can be observed that the plateaus on Sample 1 have an average size of ~28 µm, compared to ~19 µm for Sample 2. The larger plateaus exhibit better reflectivity, in agreement with the above 3D analysis.

Histograms of plateau size for the two samples
Fig. 5: Grain size analysis of the anodized aluminum samples (Sample 1 left, Sample 2 right).

Conclusion

In this application, we have showcased that the NANOVEA ST400 3D Non-Contact Profilometer is an ideal tool for analyzing and comparing the surface finish of anodized aluminum samples. The size of the plateaus on the sample surface plays an important role in the reflectivity of the anodized aluminum. The surface texture of larger plateaus is preferable to provide a better luster. The high resolution scan and comprehensive analysis tools including 3D and grain size analyses by the NANOVEA profilometer enable comprehensive and quantitative evaluation of the surface finish of metal samples, which is critical in assessing the quality and optimizing the appearance of products.

The data shown here represents only a portion of the calculations available in the analysis software. NANOVEA Profilometers measure virtually any surface in fields including Semiconductor, Microelectronics, Solar, Fiber Optics, Automotive, Aerospace, Metallurgy, Machining, Coatings, Pharmaceutical, Biomedical, Environmental and many others.

Frequently Asked Questions About Anodized Surface Finish

Why measure the texture of anodized aluminum?

The appearance of products such as phones and cameras influences consumer choice, and the roughness and texture of the anodized surface determine that appearance. Quantifying texture, consistency and directional patterns lets processes be tuned for the best result.

Was the shinier sample smoother?

No. The more lustrous Sample 1 had the higher roughness, Sa 3.94 µm, against 2.65 µm for Sample 2, which seems to contradict the usual expectation that smoother surfaces reflect more.

What explains the higher luster?

Sample 1 had larger, flatter plateaus with smoother micro-texture, separated by deeper pores; the plateaus reflect more light than the small asperities on Sample 2, even though the deep pores raise the overall roughness.

How large were the plateaus?

Grain size analysis, treating each plateau as a grain, gave an average of about 28 µm for Sample 1 and about 19 µm for Sample 2.

Which analyses were used?

False color views with ISO 25178 roughness, 3D views and 2D profiles at high magnification, and grain size analysis.

Which instrument was used?

The NANOVEA ST400 3D non-contact profilometer.

Need to Quantify Cosmetic Finish?