Application Note | Coating Wear & Adhesion Testing
Industrial Coating Scratch and Wear Evaluation of Acrylic Urethane Floor Paints
Tribometer Wear Testing and Micro Scratch Adhesion of Four Topcoats, Compared with Taber Abrasion

Research & Experimental Testing
Duanjie Li & Andrea Herrmann
Visual Design & Editorial
Andrew Shore
Introduction
Acrylic urethane paint is a type of fast-dry protective coating widely used in a variety of industrial applications, such as floor paint, auto paint, and others. When used as floor paint, it can serve areas with heavy foot and rubber-wheel traffic, such as walkways, curbs and parking lots.
Why Scratch and Wear Testing Matter for Industrial Coating Quality Control
Traditionally, Taber abrasion tests were carried out to evaluate the wear resistance of acrylic urethane floor paint according to the ASTM D4060 standard. However, as mentioned in the standard, “For some materials, abrasion tests utilizing the Taber Abraser may be subject to variation due to changes in the abrasive characteristics of the wheel during testing.” This may result in poor reproducibility of test results and create difficulty in comparing values reported from different laboratories. Moreover, in Taber abrasion tests, abrasion resistance is calculated as loss in weight at a specified number of abrasion cycles. However, acrylic urethane floor paints have a recommended dry film thickness of 37.5–50 µm.
The aggressive abrasion process by Taber Abraser can quickly wear through the acrylic urethane coating and create mass loss to the substrate leading to substantial errors in the calculation of the paint weight loss. The implant of abrasive particles in the paint during the abrasion test also contributes to errors. Therefore, a well-controlled quantifiable and reliable measurement is crucial to ensure reproducible wear evaluation of the paint. In addition, the scratch test allows users to detect premature adhesive/cohesive failures in real-life applications.
ℹ️ Learn more about friction, wear, and scratch testing lab services for industrial coatings.
Measurement Objective
In this study, we showcase that NANOVEA Tribometers and Mechanical Testers are ideal for evaluation and quality control of industrial coatings.
The wear process of acrylic urethane floor paints with different topcoats is simulated in a controlled and monitored manner using the NANOVEA Tribometer. Micro scratch testing is used to measure the load required to cause cohesive or adhesive failure to the paint.
Test Procedure
This study evaluates four commercially available water-based acrylic floor coatings that have the same primer (basecoat) and different topcoats of the same formula with a small alternation in the additive blends for the purpose of enhancing durability. These four coatings are identified as Samples A, B, C and D.

Wear Test
The NANOVEA Tribometer was applied to evaluate the tribological behavior, e.g. coefficient of friction, COF, and wear resistance. A SS440 ball tip (6 mm dia., Grade 100) was applied against the tested paints. The COF was recorded in situ. The wear rate, K, was evaluated using the formula K = V/(F × s) = A/(F × n), where V is the worn volume, F is the normal load, s is the sliding distance, A is the cross-sectional area of the wear track, and n is the number of revolutions. Surface roughness and wear track profiles were evaluated by the NANOVEA Optical Profilometer, and the wear track morphology was examined using an optical microscope.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Normal force | 20 N |
| Speed | 15 m/min |
| Duration of test | 100, 150, 300 & 800 cycles |
| Ball | SS440, 6 mm diameter, Grade 100 |
Wear test parameters.
Scratch Test
The NANOVEA Mechanical Tester equipped with a Rockwell C diamond stylus (200 µm radius) was used to perform progressive load scratch tests on the paint samples using the Micro Scratch Tester Mode. Two final loads were used: 5 N final load for investigating paint delamination from the primer, and 35 N for investigating primer delamination from the metal substrates. Three tests were repeated at the same testing conditions on each sample to ensure reproducibility of the results.
Panoramic images of the whole scratch lengths were automatically generated and their critical failure locations were correlated with the applied loads by the system software. This software feature facilitates users to perform analysis on the scratch tracks any time, rather than having to determine the critical load under the microscope immediately after the scratch tests.
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Load type | Progressive |
| Initial load | 0.01 mN |
| Final load | 5 N / 35 N |
| Loading rate | 10 / 70 N/min |
| Scratch length | 3 mm |
| Scratching speed, dx/dt | 6.0 mm/min |
| Indenter geometry | 120° cone |
| Indenter material (tip) | Diamond |
| Indenter tip radius | 200 µm |
Scratch test parameters.
Wear Test Results
Four pin-on-disk wear tests at different number of revolutions (100, 150, 300 and 800 cycles) were performed on each sample in order to monitor the evolution of wear. The surface morphology of the samples were measured with a NANOVEA 3D Non-Contact Profiler to quantify the surface roughness prior to conducting wear testing. All samples had a comparable surface roughness of approximately 1 µm as displayed in Fig. 1. The COF was recorded in situ during the wear tests as shown in Fig. 2. Fig. 4 presents the evolution of wear tracks after 100, 150, 300 and 800 cycles, and Fig. 3 summarizes the average wear rate of different samples at different stages of the wear process.
Compared with a COF value of ~0.07 for the other three samples, Sample A exhibits a much higher COF of ~0.15 at the beginning, which gradually increases and gets stable at ~0.3 after 300 wear cycles. Such a high COF accelerates the wear process and creates a substantial amount of paint debris as indicated in Fig. 4 – the topcoat of Sample A has started to be removed in the first 100 revolutions. As shown in Fig. 3, Sample A exhibits the highest wear rate of ~5 µm²/N in the first 300 cycles, which slightly decreases to ~3.5 µm²/N due to the better wear resistance of the metal substrate. The topcoat of Sample C starts to fail after 150 wear cycles as shown in Fig. 4, which is also indicated by the increase of COF in Fig. 2.
In comparison, Sample B and Sample D show enhanced tribological properties. Sample B maintains a low COF throughout the whole test – the COF slightly increases from ~0.05 to ~0.1. Such a lubricating effect substantially enhances its wear resistance – the topcoat still provides superior protection to the primer underneath after 800 wear cycles. The lowest average wear rate of only ~0.77 µm²/N is measured for Sample B at 800 cycles. The topcoat of Sample D starts to delaminate after 375 cycles, as reflected by the abrupt increase of COF in Fig. 2. The average wear rate of Sample D is ~1.1 µm²/N at 800 cycles.
Compared to the conventional Taber abrasion measurements, NANOVEA Tribometer provides well-controlled quantifiable and reliable wear assessments that ensure reproducible evaluations and quality control of commercial floor/auto paints. Moreover, the capacity of in situ COF measurements allow users to correlate the different stages of a wear process with the evolution of COF, which is critical in improving fundamental understanding of the wear mechanism and tribological characteristics of various paint coatings.




Fig. 1: 3D morphology and roughness of the paint samples.



Scratch Test Results
Fig. 5 shows the plot of normal force, frictional force and true depth as a function of scratch length for Sample A as an example. An optional acoustic emission module can be installed to provide more information. As the normal load linearly increases, the indentation tip gradually sinks into the tested sample as reflected by the progressive increase of true depth. The variation in the slopes of frictional force and true depth curves can be used as one of the implications that coating failures start to occur.

Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 show the full scratches of all four paint samples tested with a maximum load of 5 N and 35 N, respectively. Sample D required a higher load of 50 N to delaminate the primer. Scratch tests at 5 N final load (Fig. 6) evaluate the cohesive/adhesive failure of the top paint, while the ones at 35 N (Fig. 7) assess the delamination of the primer. The arrows in the micrographs indicate the point at which the top coating or the primer start to be completely removed from the primer or the substrate. The load at this point, so called Critical Load, Lc, is used to compare the cohesive or adhesive properties of the paint as summarized in Table 1.
It is evident that the paint Sample D has the best interfacial adhesion – exhibiting the highest Lc values of 4.04 N at paint delamination and 36.61 N at primer delamination. Sample B shows the second best scratch resistance. From the scratch analysis, we show that optimization of the paint formula is critical to the mechanical behaviors, or more specifically, scratch resistance and adhesion property of acrylic floor paints.
| Critical load, Lc (N) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Paint: test 1 | Paint: test 2 | Paint: test 3 | Paint: average | Primer: test 1 | Primer: test 2 | Primer: test 3 | Primer: average |
| Sample A | 3.01 | 3.21 | 3.27 | 3.16 ± 0.14 | 25.55 | 25.44 | 25.21 | 25.40 ± 0.17 |
| Sample B | 3.45 | 3.36 | 3.53 | 3.45 ± 0.08 | 27.58 | 27.80 | 28.62 | 28.00 ± 0.55 |
| Sample C | 1.61 | 1.09 | 1.57 | 1.42 ± 0.29 | 22.91 | 24.02 | 24.25 | 23.73 ± 0.72 |
| Sample D | 3.94 | 4.02 | 4.17 | 4.04 ± 0.12 | 37.98 | 36.08 | 35.77 | 36.61 ± 1.20 |
Table 1: Summary of critical loads.




Fig. 6: Micrographs of full scratch with 5 N maximum load.




Fig. 7: Micrographs of full scratch with 35 N maximum load.
Conclusion
Compared to the conventional Taber abrasion measurements, the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester and Tribometer are superior tools for evaluation and quality control of commercial floor and automotive coatings. The NANOVEA Mechanical Tester in Scratch mode can detect adhesion/cohesion problems in a coating system. The NANOVEA Tribometer provides well-controlled quantifiable and repeatable tribological analysis on wear resistance and coefficient of friction of the paints.
Based on the comprehensive tribological and mechanical analyses on the water based acrylic floor coatings tested in this study, we show that Sample B possesses the lowest COF and wear rate and the second best scratch resistance, while Sample D exhibits the best scratch resistance and second best wear resistance. This assessment allows us to evaluate and select the best candidate targeting the needs in different application environments.
The Nano and Micro modules of the NANOVEA Mechanical Tester all include ISO and ASTM compliant indentation, scratch and wear tester modes, providing the widest range of testing available for paint evaluation on a single module. The NANOVEA Tribometer offers precise and repeatable wear and friction testing using ISO and ASTM compliant rotative and linear modes, with optional high temperature wear, lubrication and tribo-corrosion modules available in one pre-integrated system. NANOVEA’s unmatched range is an ideal solution for determining the full range of mechanical/tribological properties of thin or thick, soft or hard coatings, films and substrates, including hardness, Young’s modulus, fracture toughness, adhesion, wear resistance and many others. Optional NANOVEA Non-Contact Optical Profilers are available for high resolution 3D imaging of scratches and wear tracks in addition to other surface measurements such as roughness.
Frequently Asked Questions About Industrial Coating Scratch and Wear Testing
Why test floor paint wear with a tribometer instead of a Taber abraser?
Taber abrasion results can vary with changes in the abrasive wheel during testing, which hurts reproducibility between laboratories, and the aggressive abrasion can wear through a thin acrylic urethane coating into the substrate, distorting the weight-loss calculation. A tribometer applies a controlled load and speed, records friction in situ and measures worn volume from the wear-track profile, giving well-controlled, quantifiable and reproducible results.
How is the wear rate of a paint coating calculated?
The wear rate is K = V/(F × s) = A/(F × n), where V is the worn volume, F the normal load, s the sliding distance, A the cross-sectional area of the wear track and n the number of revolutions. The wear-track profiles are measured with a NANOVEA optical profilometer.
What does a scratch test reveal about coating adhesion?
A progressive-load scratch test finds the critical load, Lc, at which a coating is completely removed from the layer beneath. In this study, a 5 N final load evaluated paint delamination from the primer and a 35 N final load assessed primer delamination from the metal substrate, with three repeats per sample.
Which acrylic floor paint performed best?
Sample B had the lowest friction and wear rate (about 0.77 µm²/N at 800 cycles) and the second best scratch resistance. Sample D had the best scratch resistance, with critical loads of 4.04 N for paint delamination and 36.61 N for primer delamination, and the second best wear resistance.
How does friction relate to coating wear?
Recording the coefficient of friction in situ shows the stages of the wear process. Sample A started at a COF of about 0.15, rising to about 0.3, and wore through its topcoat in the first 100 revolutions, while the topcoats of Samples C and D failed later, each marked by an increase in COF.
Which NANOVEA instruments are used for coating scratch and wear testing?
Wear and friction are measured on a NANOVEA Tribometer, scratch adhesion on the NANOVEA PB1000 Mechanical Tester in Micro Scratch Tester mode, and surface roughness and wear tracks with a NANOVEA optical profilometer.




