Category: Indentation | Yield Strength and Fatigue
Yield and Tensile Strength of Steel and Aluminum
Importance of Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength Measurement using Indentation
Traditionally Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength have been tested using a large tensile testing machine requiring enormous strength to pull apart test specimens. It is costly and time-consuming to properly machine many test coupons for a material where each sample can only be tested once. Small defects in the sample create a noticeable variance in test results. Different configurations and alignments of the tensile testers in the market often result in substantial variations in testing mechanics and outcomes.
Measurement Objective
In this application, the Nanovea Mechanical Tester measures the Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength of stainless steel SS304 and aluminum Al6061 metal alloy samples. The samples were chosen for their commonly recognized Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength values showing the reliability of Nanovea’s indentation methods.
Test Procedure and Procedures
The Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength tests were performed on the Nanovea Mechanical Tester in the Microindentation mode. A cylindrical flat diamond tip of 200 μm diameter was used for this application. SS304 and Al6061 alloys were selected for their extensive industrial application and commonly recognized Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength values, in order to show the great potential and reliability of the indentation method. Samples were mechanically polished to a mirror-like finish before testing to avoid surface roughness or defect influence on test results. Test conditions are listed in Table 1. More than ten tests were performed on each sample to ensure the repeatability of the test values.
Results and Discussion
Load-displacement curves of the SS304 and Al6061 alloy samples are shown in Figure 3 with the flat indenter imprints on the test samples inset. Analysis of the “S” shaped loading curve using special algorithms developed by Nanovea calculates Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength . Values are automatically calculated by the software as summarized in Table 1. Yield Strength and Ultimate Tensile Strength values obtained by conventional tensile tests are listed for comparison.
Conclusion
In this study, we showcased the capacity of Nanovea Mechanical Tester in evaluating Yield Strength & Ultimate Tensile Strength of stainless steel and aluminum alloy sheet samples. The simple experimental setup significantly cuts the time and cost for sample preparation required for tensile tests. The small indentation size makes it possible to perform multiple measurements on one single sample. This method allows YS/UTS measurements on small samples and localized areas, providing a solution for YS/UTS mapping and local defect detection of pipelines or auto structure.
The Nano, Micro or Macro modules of the Nanovea Mechanical Tester all include ISO and ASTM compliant indentation, scratch and wear tester modes, providing the widest and most user friendly range of testing available in a single system. Nanovea’s unmatched range is an ideal solution for determining the full range of mechanical properties of thin or thick, soft or hard coatings, films and substrates, including hardness, Young’s modulus, fracture toughness, adhesion, wear resistance and many others. In addition, optional 3D non-contact profiler and AFM Module are available for high resolution 3D imaging of indentation, scratch and wear track in addition to other surface measurements such as roughness.
NOW, LET'S TALK ABOUT YOUR APPLICATION
Cyclical Nanoindentation Stress-Strain Measurement
Cyclical Nanoindentation Stress-Strain Measurement
Learn more
Importance of Nanoindentation
Continuous stiffness measurements (CSM) obtained by nanoindentation reveals the stress-strain relationship of materials with minimally invasive methods. Unlike traditional tensile testing methods, nanoindentation provides stress-strain data at the nanoscale without the need of a large instrument. The stress-strain curve provides crucial information on the threshold between elastic and plastic behavior as the sample is subject to increasing loads. CSM gives the capability to determine the yield stress of a material without dangerous equipment.
Nanoindentation provides a reliable and user-friendly method to quickly investigate stress-strain data. Furthermore, measuring stress-strain behavior on the nanoscale makes it possible to study important properties on small coatings and particles in materials as they get more advanced. Nanoindentation provides information on elastic limit and yield strength in addition to hardness, elastic modulus, creep, fracture toughness, etc. making it a versatile metrology instrument.
The stress-strain data provided by nanoindentation in this study identifies the elastic limit of the material while only going 1.2 microns into the surface. We use CSM to determine how mechanical properties of materials develop as an indenter travels deeper into the surface. This is especially useful in thin film applications where properties can be depth dependent. Nanoindentation is a minimally invasive method of confirming material properties in test samples.
The CSM test is useful in measuring material properties versus depth. Cyclical tests can be performed at constant loads to determine more complex material properties. This can be useful to study fatigue or eliminate the effect of porosity to obtain true elastic modulus.
Measurement Objective
In this application, the Nanovea mechanical tester uses CSM to study hardness and elastic modulus versus depth and stress-strain data on a standard steel sample. Steel was chosen for its commonly recognized characteristics to display the control and accuracy of the nanoscale stress-strain data. A spherical tip with a 5-micron radius was used to reach high enough stresses beyond the elastic limit for steel.
Test Conditions & Procedures
The following indentation parameters were used:
Results:
Increase in load during oscillations provide the following depth versus load curve. Over 100 oscillations were conducted during loading to find the stress-strain data as the indenter penetrates the material.
We determined stress and strain from the information obtained at each cycle. The maximum load and depth at each cycle allows us to calculate the maximum stress applied in each cycle to the material. Strain is calculated from the residual depth at each cycle from the partial unloading. This allows us to calculate the radius of the residual imprint by dividing the radius of the tip to give the strain factor. Plotting stress versus strain for the material shows the elastic and plastic zones with the corresponding elastic limit stress. Our tests determined the transition between the elastic and plastic zones of the material to be around 0.076 strain with an elastic limit of 1.45 GPa.
Each cycle acts as a single indent so as we increase load, we run tests at various controlled depths in the steel. So, hardness and elastic modulus versus depth can be plotted directly from the data obtained for each cycle.
As the indenter travels into the material we see hardness increase and elastic modulus decrease.
Conclusion
We have shown the Nanovea mechanical tester provides reliable stress-strain data. Using a spherical tip with CSM indentation allows for material property measurement under increased stress. Load and indenter radius can be changed to test various materials at controlled depths. Nanovea mechanical testers provide these indentation tests from the sub mN range to 400N.
3 Point Bend Test Using Microindentation
In this application, the Nanovea Mechanical Tester, in Microindentation mode, is used to measure the flexural strength (using 3 Point Bend) of various sized rod samples (pasta) to show a range of data. 2 different diameters were chosen to demonstrate both elastic and brittle characteristics. Using a flat tip indenter to apply a point load, we determine stiffness (Young’s Modulus) and identify the critical loads at which the sample will fracture.
Categorías
- Application Notes
- Block on Ring Tribology
- Corrosion Tribology
- Friction Testing | Coefficient of Friction
- High Temperature Mechanical Testing
- High Temperature Tribology
- Humidity and Gases Tribology
- Humidity Mechanical Testing
- Indentation | Creep and Relaxation
- Indentation | Fracture Toughness
- Indentation | Hardness and Elastic
- Indentation | Loss and Storage
- Indentation | Stress vs Strain
- Indentation | Yield Strength and Fatigue
- Laboratory Testing
- Linear Tribology
- Liquid Mechanical Testing
- Liquid Tribology
- Low Temperature Tribology
- Mechanical Testing
- Press Release
- Profilometry | Flatness and Warpage
- Profilometry | Geometry and Shape
- Profilometry | Roughness and Finish
- Profilometry | Step Height and Thickness
- Profilometry | Texture and Grain
- Profilometry | Volume and Area
- Profilometry Testing
- Ring on Ring Tribology
- Rotational Tribology
- Scratch Testing | Adhesive Failure
- Scratch Testing | Cohesive Failure
- Scratch Testing | Multi-Pass Wear
- Scratch Testing | Scratch Hardness
- Scratch Testing Tribology
- Tradeshow
- Tribology Testing
- Uncategorized
Archivos
- septiembre 2023
- agosto 2023
- junio 2023
- mayo 2023
- julio 2022
- mayo 2022
- abril 2022
- enero 2022
- diciembre 2021
- noviembre 2021
- octubre 2021
- septiembre 2021
- agosto 2021
- julio 2021
- junio 2021
- mayo 2021
- marzo 2021
- febrero 2021
- diciembre 2020
- noviembre 2020
- octubre 2020
- septiembre 2020
- julio 2020
- mayo 2020
- abril 2020
- marzo 2020
- febrero 2020
- enero 2020
- noviembre 2019
- octubre 2019
- septiembre 2019
- agosto 2019
- julio 2019
- junio 2019
- mayo 2019
- abril 2019
- marzo 2019
- enero 2019
- diciembre 2018
- noviembre 2018
- octubre 2018
- septiembre 2018
- julio 2018
- junio 2018
- mayo 2018
- abril 2018
- marzo 2018
- febrero 2018
- noviembre 2017
- octubre 2017
- septiembre 2017
- agosto 2017
- junio 2017
- mayo 2017
- abril 2017
- marzo 2017
- febrero 2017
- enero 2017
- noviembre 2016
- octubre 2016
- agosto 2016
- julio 2016
- junio 2016
- mayo 2016
- abril 2016
- marzo 2016
- febrero 2016
- enero 2016
- diciembre 2015
- noviembre 2015
- octubre 2015
- septiembre 2015
- agosto 2015
- julio 2015
- junio 2015
- mayo 2015
- abril 2015
- marzo 2015
- febrero 2015
- enero 2015
- noviembre 2014
- octubre 2014
- septiembre 2014
- agosto 2014
- julio 2014
- junio 2014
- mayo 2014
- abril 2014
- marzo 2014
- febrero 2014
- enero 2014
- diciembre 2013
- noviembre 2013
- octubre 2013
- septiembre 2013
- agosto 2013
- julio 2013
- junio 2013
- mayo 2013
- abril 2013
- marzo 2013
- febrero 2013
- enero 2013
- diciembre 2012
- noviembre 2012
- octubre 2012
- septiembre 2012
- agosto 2012
- julio 2012
- junio 2012
- mayo 2012
- abril 2012
- marzo 2012
- febrero 2012
- enero 2012
- diciembre 2011
- noviembre 2011
- octubre 2011
- septiembre 2011
- agosto 2011
- julio 2011
- junio 2011
- mayo 2011
- noviembre 2010
- enero 2010
- abril 2009
- marzo 2009
- enero 2009
- diciembre 2008
- octubre 2008
- agosto 2007
- julio 2006
- marzo 2006
- enero 2005
- abril 2004