<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>维克斯硬度档案 -</title>
	<atom:link href="https://nanovea.com/zh/tag/vickers-hardness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://nanovea.com/zh/标签/维克多-哈德/</link>
	<description>用于材料研究和质量控制的计量仪器</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:29:45 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<language>zh-Hans</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>
	每小时	</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>
	1	</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>维氏硬度与仪器化宏观压痕的对比</title>
		<link>https://nanovea.com/zh/%e7%bb%b4%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%9a-%e5%93%88%e5%be%b7/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vickers-hardness</link>
					<comments>https://nanovea.com/zh/%e7%bb%b4%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%9a-%e5%93%88%e5%be%b7/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nanovea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:29:02 +0000</pubdate>
				<category><![CDATA[Application Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vickers hardness]]></category>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://nanovea.com/?p=2286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Macroindentation hardness tests are widely used to determine the overall hardness of a material. There are a variety of macrohardness measurements, including but not limited to Vickers hardness test (HV), Brinell hardness test (HB), Knoop hardness test (HK) and Rockwell hardness test (HR). With one of the largest scales among hardness tests, the Vickers test [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://nanovea.com/zh/%e7%bb%b4%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%9a-%e5%93%88%e5%be%b7/">Vickers Hardness vs. Instrumented Macroindentation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://nanovea.com/zh">NANOVEA: Advanced Profilometers, Tribometers, Nanoindenters, and Scratch Testers for Materials Testing</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>宏观压痕硬度测试被广泛用于确定材料的整体硬度。有多种宏观硬度测量方法，包括但不限于维氏硬度测试（HV）、布氏硬度测试（HB）、努氏硬度测试（HK）和洛氏硬度测试（HR）。维氏测试是硬度测试中规模最大的测试方法之一，被广泛用于测量所有金属的硬度。维氏硬度计使用的钻石是以方形为基础的金字塔形式，每边与水平面的角度为22°。它在样品表面压入，形成一个方形的印记。通过测量对角线的平均长度d，可以用公式计算出维氏硬度：其中F的单位是N，d的单位是毫米。在此，为了获得准确的硬度值，对d值的准确测量是至关重要的。相比之下，仪器压痕技术是通过压痕载荷和位移测量直接测量机械性能。不需要对压痕进行视觉观察；消除了用户在确定压痕的d值时的误差。</p>
<p><a href="https://nanovea.com/wp-content/themes/wp-nanovea/Application%20Notes/vickers-hardness.pdf" target="_blank">维氏硬度与仪器化宏观压痕的对比</a></p><p>The post <a href="https://nanovea.com/zh/%e7%bb%b4%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%9a-%e5%93%88%e5%be%b7/">Vickers Hardness vs. Instrumented Macroindentation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://nanovea.com/zh">NANOVEA: Advanced Profilometers, Tribometers, Nanoindenters, and Scratch Testers for Materials Testing</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentrss>https://nanovea.com/zh/%e7%bb%b4%e5%85%8b%e5%a4%9a-%e5%93%88%e5%be%b7/feed/</wfw:commentrss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>